Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Posting\s+of\s+calendar\s+art\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Posting\s+of\s+calendar\s+art\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: "rcp95240" <rcp95240@a...>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:56:30 -0600; Is there any legal reason(s)why I could not post any image of the 1941 Burlington calendar? With the news full of stories about this person sueing that person over downloading of copyrighted material; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00156.html (7,094 bytes)
2. Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: "kd 423" <kd423@h...>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:24:19 -0500; Hi, Norm is right on target. Possession in this case (and others) is not 9/10's of the law. The calendars were copyrighted by the railroad and you, as an individual, can copy anything for your own pe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00164.html (7,747 bytes)
3. Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@E...>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:10:22 -0500; I don't know anything about copyright law and I am certainly not a lawyer, but I think, in the case of an old calendar, that the line is somewhat gray concerning copyright of such items. Since BNSF's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00168.html (10,513 bytes)
4. Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: "rcp95240" <rcp95240@a...>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:19:48 -0600; There comes a time in a person's life when they have to stand up and decide whether or not to live by their principles. I am standing and I will contact Mr. Hiatte for the offical BNSF permission.. F; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00173.html (7,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]