Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SPAM\]Re\:\s+\[CBQ\]\s+Stewart\s+F\s+units\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 21:20:43 +0000
My approach to painting models is to paint for a new paint job and let weathering do the rest. The only up front paint modification I make is to paint the initial coat with a slight fade of the base
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00135.html (23,229 bytes)

2. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 21:29:38 +0000
Given the variation in grays, Im glad I dont have deal with red variations (I model 1953). The frustrating thing to me is having to preorder sight unseen and take what you get. The most extreme gray
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00136.html (28,410 bytes)

3. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "popbumper1" <popbumper1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 16:33:15 -0500
As an adjunct question, does anyone know how many, if any, graybacks made it to the BN merger? I see so many early and post merger photos with ex NP and GN F's, but never any Q units. Thanks! Sent fr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00137.html (27,674 bytes)

4. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "James Sandrin" <sandmantrains@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:50:53 -0600
Concerning the survivors, only 168A was operable at the merger.  It became trade-in material for an SD45 in September 1970.  The Q was effectively the first Class one the eliminate the F-unit  from i
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00138.html (29,653 bytes)

5. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 21:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
There were two F7s still on the roster on M-Day. Both were off the roster within months. 168A was assigned BN No. 796 but never applied and 168C didn't get one. Both were traded in on SD45s. Bryan J.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00139.html (28,544 bytes)

6. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "popbumper1" <popbumper1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 17:01:26 -0500
Wow Jim, a single unit....very interesting! Thank you! Chris Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message -- From: James Sandrin <sandmantrains@gmail.com> Date: 5/28/21 4:51 PM
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00140.html (30,665 bytes)

7. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Manley" <scott.manley@smsooland.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 22:07:35 +0000
Hol Wagners photo of 168A in Sioux City IA 5/1970 looking pretty rough ServiceMaster of Sooland 1905 A Street South Sioux City, NE 68776 402-494-3188 Office 402-494-5035 Fax www.smsooland.com Special
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00141.html (37,551 bytes)

8. Re: [SPAM]Re: [CBQ] Stewart F units (score: 1)
Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 23:48:30 +0000
Scott: Glad you posted the photo, but while it's from my collection, I'm not the photographer; my good friend, the late Ken Crist, took the photo. Hol Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -- Original
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-05/msg00143.html (36,850 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu