Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+correction\s+\-\s+W\.\s+Burl\s+litigation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+correction\s+\-\s+W\.\s+Burl\s+litigation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] correction - W. Burl litigation (score: 1): Author: "gaedgar66" <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:26:20 -0600; Yikes! Must be end-of-week fatigue! Reread what I wrote AFTER posting (dumb) & saw the obvious error (blame it on too many creosote fumes). B&MI (Burlington & Missouri in Iowa) blt the trackage from; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-03/msg00072.html (8,727 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] correction - W. Burl litigation (score: 1): Author: "Richard Patterson" <rpatter@trib.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:52:54 -0700; Gerald, I may be wrong, but I believe the West Burlington Shops are actually located within an area annexed by the city of Burlington prior to their construction. This, in spite of the fact they are; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-03/msg00073.html (10,532 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] correction - W. Burl litigation (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 21:30:11 -0600; Gerald, Rick, et al. The correct name of the railroad that built from Burlington west was the Burlington & Missouri River Rail Road. They, along with the City, were in fact the original parties in th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-03/msg00074.html (10,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]