Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+The\s+St\.\s+Paul\s+Accord\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+The\s+St\.\s+Paul\s+Accord\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via Groups.Io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:53:42 -0500; Wondering if anyone can confirm that prior to the BN merger there was a division of traffic agreement on eastbound business coming into the Twin Cities from GN/NP ? Supposedly all roads operating bet; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00059.html (11,014 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Fred Crissey" <fhc925@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:07:32 +0000 (UTC); _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55227) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Change Your Subscription Group Home Contact Group Owner Terms Of Se; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00063.html (13,838 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via Groups.Io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:24:40 -0500; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55228) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Change Your Subscription Group Home Contact Group Owner Terms Of S; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00064.html (14,829 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:51:04 -0500; Leo and all- I dont have anything to show at the moment but somehow I do recall conversations about this subject, either email or at a meet in the past. Specifically, that the GN and NP had agreement; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00065.html (11,632 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Eisfeller" <bigeee@trainvideos.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 05:47:17 -0700; Here is an example of the division of cars on GN eastbounds. These totals are from consists of GN trains #2/88, #98, #82, and #1/88 out of Minot and #438 out of Breckenridge for Sunday 11/23/69: 90 l; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00068.html (11,589 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via Groups.Io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 09:37:52 -0500; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55233) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Change Your Subscription Group Home Contact Group Owner Terms Of S; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00069.html (11,903 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "Fred Crissey" <fhc925@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:52:13 +0000 (UTC); _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55237) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Change Your Subscription Group Home Contact Group Owner Terms Of S; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00073.html (13,356 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] The St. Paul Accord ? (score: 1): Author: "kurthayek via Groups.Io" <kurthayek=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:57:43 -0700; MNS had rights over CGW (and later CNW) from Northfield to Randolph on CGW main line. Substantial interchange traffic MNS to CGW/CNW at Randolph; at least as much with RI, possibly more. Southbound t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-03/msg00076.html (11,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]