- 1. [CBQ] The CB&Q and the REA (score: 1)
- Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:36 -0500
- This brings up a question I have been wondering about that hasn't been fully answered. Why, if the CB&Q was so involved with the REA, didn't the Q have REA Express reefers lettered CB&Q as so many ro
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-05/msg00166.html (13,425 bytes)
- 2. RE: [CBQ] The CB&Q and the REA (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Lambert" <dave@dglambert.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:13:42 -0400
- Charlie, You ask a good question. My understanding of the possible answer follows: Remember who owned the CB&Q. They certainly had something to say about the ownership (or lack thereof) of express re
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-05/msg00168.html (16,980 bytes)
- 3. RE: [CBQ] The CB&Q and the REA (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Webber <cz17@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:39:43 -0500
- The WP & D&RGW also leased cars from GATX for Express service - but in both cases, they were gone by the mid 40s. The Walthers & BLI cars are correct for these, and they did show up on the Expo. In f
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-05/msg00169.html (18,774 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] The CB&Q and the REA (score: 1)
- Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:34:16 -0500
- DaveYes, I was referring to the General American cars as I did the artwork for them for BLI. I agree with your analysis but still wish it wasn't true! By the way, I forgot the 50 FT steel express ree
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-05/msg00174.html (12,961 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] The CB&Q and the REA (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Webber <cz17@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:45:01 -0500
- A little too early for the CZ (the D&RGW & WP ones were gone by 1944). We DO know that ACL 666, the "nuke" car was put on the CZ ahead of the baggage at least 2 times in 1967. That's a modified HW co
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-05/msg00175.html (14,014 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu