- 1. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "David Weber dave@cimmarondesign.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 17:35:07 -0600
- __._,_.___ Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00008.html (22,356 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:34:02 -0400
- Overall, the Railroad Retirement system is way better than Social Security. But it burns me up that I am allowed to work for WalMart, Home Depot, or even form a consulting company, but if I work so
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00009.html (30,370 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Qutlx1 qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:27:23 -0500
- bless them all that are still having fun On Jun 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Pete, The age 70 forced retirement age came into place in the 1950s in the fi
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00010.html (20,531 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 22:34:55 -0400
- Leo et al...I'm on a couple of "railroad oriented" facegroups..All I hear is griping and complaining and the most foul language I ever heard is just part of the conversation. Worse than I ever heard
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00011.html (21,259 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 23:19:11 -0400
- Pete, it's like that all over. I have heard countless stories from various railroads of employees being suspended or fired for the most trivial offenses, and in the most contrived, set-up scenarios
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00012.html (48,689 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Erik Spoonmore spoony81@att.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 00:22:44 -0500
- bless them all that are still having fun On Jun 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Pete, The age 70 forced retirement age came into place in the 1950s in the fi
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00013.html (20,503 bytes)
- 7. RE: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "'Dave Lotz' Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:15:47 -0400
- Hi all, While the discussion on this has been enlightening, it is really beyond the scope of this list. Let's move on to ore CB&Q-related discussions please. Dave Lotz CBQ List Owner __._,_.___ Poste
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00014.html (13,121 bytes)
- 8. Fw: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 08:53:47 -0500
- Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. From: dhartman@mchsi.com Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 8:52 AM To: 'Dave Lotz' Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net [CBQ] Subject: Re: [C
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00015.html (19,452 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 08:52:16 -0500
- Dave, Respectfully, and acknowledging how lists can easily go off topic, I disagree. Any discussion that compares current former-Q with historical Q operations and culture is valid and germane. To re
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00016.html (17,331 bytes)
- 10. [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:40:29 -0400
- June 29, 2017 Leo - Here's someone else you may want to interview: http://www.galesburg.com/news/20170629/hes-been-working-on-railroad Mr. Hill started out firing Q steam at Galesburg in 1959. He's s
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-06/msg00176.html (11,882 bytes)
- 11. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:07:41 -0400
- Leo and Louis Interesting to hear about someone still working as a locomotive engineer who is almost as old as I am..(81)...I thought that...even back in my day (1956) that an arbitrary requirement f
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-06/msg00190.html (15,098 bytes)
- 12. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:14:24 -0500
- Leo and Louis Interesting to hear about someone still working as a locomotive engineer who is almost as old as I am..(81)...I thought that...even back in my day (1956) that an arbitrary requirement
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-06/msg00191.html (16,610 bytes)
- 13. Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:33:35 -0400
- thanks Leo..I intended to specify what I recall was the "arbitrary" age and forgot to do so in my post..But it was..as you stated 70 and I recall that it became the subject of several conversations t
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-06/msg00193.html (17,937 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu