BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78
From: "Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 23:19:11 -0400
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=rochester.rr.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=rochester.rr.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1499051952; bh=dP5nvrbDr/Nx7+edKdMjG8yoaAbxb+aKjGIIG/we7YI=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=1WPcLe+6GHQaqu1gO8Bk/Lb3QPISkXA+4MKd94OxXHky3kP5wpZ4MID4dagHwC9s7rV8fkvfWtsENha4vd6LVG6Oc3WZhN1rLmA02W2ucTgq1GKXw0c2Yv1AKgjMTZEo9aWUaCCuYCelcmvDYjnFGJm4ZCFS3rKbc+sD3lj5gOI=
In-reply-to: <15d064cfcf0-1ae1-5e20@webjasstg-vab53.srv.aolmail.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <15d064cfcf0-1ae1-5e20@webjasstg-vab53.srv.aolmail.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1


Pete, it's like that all over.  I have heard countless stories from various railroads of employees being suspended or fired for the most trivial offenses, and in the most contrived, set-up scenarios which almost force them to break a rule just so the supervisor can play "Gotcha!"

There are so many factors which have gotten us to this point, it's not one simple thing.  BUT I think one very big factor is that today's railroading is simpler and has been reduced to operations which require less thinking and responsibility on the part of the employees.

Don't take that the wrong way, I have a lot of respect for today's guys out there dealing with this stuff.  But for those of you who can remember back, compare loose-car railroading with today's unit trains running from A to B.  If today's officials went back to a 5-man crew, trying to serve 15 customers on a branch, each one with cars in, out and set back, using hand signals and no radios, and with the engineer or fireman having to improvise repair with a flagstick or matchbook cover to keep a balky diesel moving, they a) would have a meltdown at the things that sometimes were done to get the work done, and b) would find that randomly taking men out of service would generate consequences from the Superintendent when the work did not get done, from the union for the tactics, and from the men themself who could make you or break you in so many ways.

Yes, there always have been tests for rules compliance, and occasionally someone serving a little time is a good message to the rest.  But we have lost the urgency and complexity, and moving freight is now secondary to following a PLAN or a PROCEDURE.

And let me add my voice to the chorus.  The biggest reason I pulled the pin about 6 years ago was because it wasn't fun any more.  (HARRUMPH, says the grumpy old man!)



On 7/2/2017 10:34 PM, Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ] wrote:
 

Leo et al...I'm on a couple of "railroad oriented" facegroups..All I hear is griping and complaining and the most foul language I ever heard is just part of the conversation.  Worse than I ever heard when I was on the "payroll"...There seems to be a competition out there between today's officials to see who can get the most of his employees fired.


Some of us were up at Fremont a couple weeks ago and there was a utility guy came over and talked to us in that same vain..Said he go "wrote up" for improperly hanging on a car..Didn't have three point contact or some other ridiculous stuff.  

He also said he was going over to order his "safety supplies" which the company pays for a ships direct to his home...

Sure 'ain't like it used to be"...I'm really glad that I at least got in on the tail end of railroading as it had always been.  


Pete


-----Original Message-----
From: Qutlx1 qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Jul 2, 2017 8:27 pm
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78

 
Dave,

They are ver few and far between as far as having fun. I talk with the few I know still working and watched the crews at the Galesburg meet as they came and went from the hotel. To a man all I hear is "Leo it ain't like it used to be, it ain't fun "

Leo

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 2, 2017, at 6:35 PM, David Weber dave@cimmarondesign.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
bless them all that are still having fun

On Jun 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Pete,

The age 70 forced retirement age came into place in the 1950s in the files I've been reviewing. My understanding that rule was eliminated durin g Ro nald Reagan's presidency. Employees can work as long as they wish as long as they can meet the requirements.

Leo

On Jun 30, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Leo and Louis

Interesting to hear about someone still working as a locomotive engineer who is almost as old as I am..(81)...I thought that...even back in my day (1956) that an arbitrary requirement for engineers was agreed on by both "The Company" and BLE and Bof LF&E.  

Can they keep on working as long as they can pass the "physical"..??

I believe that steam was last used on the Omaha-Lincoln divisions in fall 1959.  In my first summer as a trainman  (1956) there was still lots of steam working the yard at Lincoln and some on the Lincoln-Hastings line.  I think also some was used on "Lines East" into fall 1959.  If that's so then Mr. Hill could have fired steam in his first year.

Also in the summer 1956 a steam engine (5080 was one I saw at least) was kept hot at Ravenna as protection.  In those days waycars were still being changed at Ravenna and I made a trip or two off the extra board from Lincoln-Ravenna and saw the 5080 at work on the Ravenna switcher..)Ho urs 1:00am-9:00am.  

In late summer 56 I was "forced" on the Ravenna switcher for a three week stint...a lousy job..Night hours and no OT.  Well, I thought maybe I'll get a break and get to work with steam.  Well, it never happened.  Here's why..

At that time two locals worked out of Ravenna.  There was the Ravenna-Aurora-Burwell local and the Tri weekly Lincoln-Ravenna local.  Both those locals used Geeps as regular power and they worked out of Ravenna on alternate nights..Hence there was always a "Geep" available for night use on the switcher..An excellent and efficient use of motive power but "fatal" to my hope and dream  to work with a steam engine. Also that 5080 was run to Lincoln every month or so for "inspection"..They would usually tie a few cars on her and run her extra..I never got to do that either...

Hence I never got the opportunity to make the claim that I could have made to "have worked in PAID REGULAR REVENUE SERVICE on steam.  

I do hold claim however to have "worked" in NON PAID revenue service firing RPLN 440  Nee B&MR 156 on the Rock Port Langdon and Northern..ages up to 9.  

Pete


-----Original Message-----
From: LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
To: cbq <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 29, 2017 5:40 pm
Subject: [CBQ] Still Working As Age 78

 
June 29, 2017
 
Leo - Here's someone else you may want to interview:
 
 
Mr. Hill started out firing Q steam at Galesburg in 1959. He's still working as a BNSF hogger at age 78. That must set some kind of record, at least for today. I'd like to have some of his DNA! 
 
Wonder if he's a BRHS member or knows about this Group? Best Regards - Louis
 
Louis Zadnichek II
Fairhope, AL
 
 






__._,_.___

Posted by: Don Brown <dbrown02@rochester.rr.com>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>