Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:Re\:\s+new\s+locomotives\s+and\s+cost\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:58:59 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "ANDREW KOETZ" andrewkoetz@gmail.com andrewkoetz Fri Dec 2, 2011 10:01 pm (PST) Andrew, I not sure what prompted your post. It appears that the actual content
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00012.html (22,212 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 22:06:17 -0600
Jason, Great list for the period, but you might want to ad a couple more. These would include Union Pacific, Chicago & Northwestern, Western Pacific, Katy, Missouri Pacific, Rock Island (it didn't de
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00016.html (12,463 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:10:59 -0800 (PST)
DM&IR is now owned by CN. From: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com> To: railmaster <railmaster@suddenlink.net> Cc: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re:
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00017.html (14,558 bytes)

4. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:06:53 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "Cy Svobodny" ctsvobodny@yahoo.com ctsvobodny Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:12 pm (PST) Cy, That is correct, today, but in the time period identified of 1980, DM&IR was st
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00020.html (14,261 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: jeff worones <jworones@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:49:58 -0800 (PST)
The Rock Island's last order for GP38-2s was diverted to the CNW in 4Q1979. By that time the RI was declared cashless and operated by the KCT. The RI was shutdown on 3/31/1980. Sorry - a bit off CBQ
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00021.html (11,791 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: railmaster <railmaster@suddenlink.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:15:53 -0600
It was said that in 1980 had about 30 costomers. The following rr I came up with. Santa Fe Burlington Northern Conrail Milwakee Road Southern Pacific Frisco Chessie System Seaboard Coast Line Louisiv
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00022.html (12,364 bytes)

7. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick P" <dblp1@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:55:01 -0600
The differences of opinons between the various railroads caused lots of minor problems with verious mergers. Without going back into my files, I can't tell you which was which for sure, but when Penn
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00025.html (21,450 bytes)

8. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: "Joe" <mp36er@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:55:01 -0600
Only the last sentence was written by Ryan. Andrew was responding to a post that Ryan had made in a topic that had otherwise ended a couple months ago. Andrew didn't make it clear that he had copied
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00035.html (11,181 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu