Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+ICC\s+Accident\s+reports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+ICC\s+Accident\s+reports\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "William Canelos sharronbillc@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC); Great Job Rupert! Thanks, definitely a nice piece of research. I too was surprised how often flagging failure was the cause. It really stood out. Bill __._,_.___ Posted by: William Canelos <sharronbi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00040.html (13,251 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "'Douglas Harding' doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:42:47 -0600; I am not surprised at the number of flagging citations. There are 10 accidents out of 96 where flagging failure is reported as the cause, that is 10%. All are in the earlier years, when Timetable and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00041.html (13,586 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:39:49 +1300; Doug I’ve had a look at the table (and found a couple of spelling errors so a new table has been uploaded) and counted up the principal causes I previously recorded in generalised terms. In des; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00049.html (19,842 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "'John D. Mitchell, Jr.' cbqrr47@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:59:53 +0000 (UTC); Doug Ive had a look at the table (and found a couple of spelling errors so a new table has been uploaded) and counted up the principal causes I previously recorded in generalised terms. In descendin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00050.html (22,146 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "ralph linroth wcman8@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 04:13:13 +0000 (UTC); Doug Ive had a look at the table (and found a couple of spelling errors so a new table has been uploaded) and counted up the principal causes I previously recorded in generalized terms. In descendin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00051.html (23,956 bytes)
6. RE: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:13:44 +1300; John Thanks for that. I only recorded those Reports which were listed as CB&Q, etc. in the annual lists – I didn’t go looking in the Reports of other roads. I wouldn’t be surprised; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00052.html (26,878 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:20:03 +1300; Bud Thanks for this information. How did flagmen measure the distance or was it guesswork? Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] Sent: 17 November 2015 17:1; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00053.html (17,125 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Re: ICC Accident reports (score: 1): Author: "graywolfs02@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 17 Nov 2015 14:47:17 -0800; Hi Rupert, I believe they would go by the milepost markers. I also believe that they would use the line-side poles (telegraph, phone, signal lines etc.) as they would know how many poles to a mile...; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00060.html (12,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]