Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Rail\s+length\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Rail\s+length\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "BRAD SLANEY" <bradslaney@viawestdu.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 07:47:32 -0800; What were the problems with the rail? BRAD _____ From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sholding@sbcglobal.net Sent: 10/31/2006 9:12 PM To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Subject: R; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-11/msg00003.html (10,371 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:14:19 -0600; TOO Soft to hold up under traffic. Had slow orders on it almost from day one Last on Chicago Div was just south of Bushnell towards Beardstown sjh -- Original Message -- From: BRAD SLANEY To: CBQ@yah; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-11/msg00010.html (10,552 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "laureledge18" <rawolter@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:09:46 -0600; I'm modeling a stack of rails and ties on my layout. Anyone know what the standard length of rail was before the days of welded rail? Specifically, this will be placed alongside a yard. Thanks. Dick; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00134.html (10,040 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: VERLIN WHITE <verlinwhite@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:24:43 -0800 (PST); Hi, 13 yards or 39 feet [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00135.html (10,356 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:27:02 EST; Standard rail length for jointed rail was 39 ft. Pete [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/grou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00136.html (9,743 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: allenm@solve.net; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:31:25 -0600 (CST); Rail was 39 ft. lengths and last time I knew, some were still shipped out of the steel mills in this length. Allen Moore Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.y; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00137.html (10,709 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "BRAD SLANEY" <bradslaney@viawestdu.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:38:38 -0800; An interesting tidbit to this thread. About two years ago, I had a conversation with Bob Downing and Earl Currie and the BN had approached the steel industry about having rail manufactured in a longe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00138.html (11,228 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "gary laakso" <vasa0vasa@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:56:30 -0500; More then that, the rail industry operated like a cartel in the US based upon geography and a western railroad could NEVER order from US Steel...the west was allocated to the sole rail maker in the w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00142.html (11,402 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: rmh711@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:30:09 EST; Hello, 39 feet was (is) standard for single sections of rail depending on how far back you wish to go. I know we replaced some 33' rail on the CNW back in the late '70's. rich [Non-text portions of t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00144.html (9,914 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "Philip Weibler" <pawnbaw@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:49:04 -0600; Hello, CBQlist - When the steel mill rolls rail it comes out in a long, continuous strip. It is cut to length for shipment. In the "good old days" of wooden cars and iron men when most freight cars w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00145.html (11,055 bytes)
11. RE: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:51:54 -0800 (PST); Was that sole rail maker Colorado Fuel and Iron? sjl An interesting tidbit to this thread. About two years ago, I had a conversation with Bob Downing and Earl Currie and the BN had approached the ste; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00148.html (11,769 bytes)
12. RE: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: "gary laakso" <vasa0vasa@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:37:52 -0500; Yes, CF&I had the western cartel rail market with no competition from any domestic steel producer. Was that sole rail maker Colorado Fuel and Iron? sjl An interesting tidbit to this thread. About two; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00149.html (11,855 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Rail length (score: 1): Author: <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:11:33 -0600; And the good Japanese rail was just about as good as trying to run a railroad on 2 X 4's sjh -- Original Message -- From: gary laakso To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com ; CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, Octo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00151.html (12,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]