Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Plate\s+C\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:48:28 +1300
Can anyone advise the maximum measurements for a box car to remain within Plate C dimensions? Thanks Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Link
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00153.html (9,860 bytes)

2. [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: qutlx1@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:56:51 EST
The dimensional limits of the various plates are in the back section of the Official Railway Equip. Register. Plate C: Extreme Width 10' 8". Height from top of rail 16' 6". Hope this helps. Leo [Non-
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00159.html (9,873 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:21:23 +1300
Leo Thanks for this. I've plenty of ORER pages but not a complete one! I was trying to identify the dimensions by logic without success. Cars are shown in the 1970 ORER as being within Plate C but sh
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00163.html (10,980 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:43:41 -0800 (PST)
____________________________________________________________________________________ Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit yo
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00165.html (11,645 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:44:47 -0800 (PST)
____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Lin
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00166.html (11,718 bytes)

6. Fwd: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: qutlx1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:14:52 EST
Yes, As of my copy of ORER(7/05) 10' 08" is the extreme limit for width under plate C. Could the cars exceed plate C due to heighth or due to width at a different point on the car. The diagram in the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00170.html (10,149 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:38:07 +1300
Leo The plan shows the maximum width as 10' 8" but not at any particular point. I did wonder about periodic changes to the dimensions. Does anyone have a 1969 or 1970 ORER who can check the maximums
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00172.html (10,961 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:32:43 -0600
Rupert July 10, 1974 ORER shows on Page 1113 Plate C light car conditions 10' 8 " wide by 15' 6" tall above rail Oct. 21, 1981 ORER shows on page 1413 Plate C 10' 8" wide by 15' 6" tall E 10' 8" wide
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00177.html (11,887 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:29:11 +1300
Steve Thanks for this. I'll have a further study of the situation. Can anyone help with the 1969 or 1970 Plate C dimensions? Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://grou
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00179.html (11,259 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:38:32 -0600
Rupert They are the same as adopted in 1963 Plate C stayed the same Jan 1969 P 1135 15' 6" high Plate B 10' 8 wide by 15' 1" high Would you want scans of the B, C, E and F Steve -- Original Message -
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00200.html (11,572 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] Plate C (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:59:25 +1300
Steve and Tom and Cy, etc. Thanks for your responses. I didn't realise that Plate C etc. was "so old" as the ORER's only noted it on the freight car pages from 1969. I'm still a touch confused over t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00204.html (11,586 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu