Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Perfect\s+gentlemen\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Perfect\s+gentlemen\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:06:52 +1200; Pete Back in 1921, the Burlington's vice-president announced that the Burlington was conducting a courtesy campaign among its employes. He said "In the management of a property requiring 60,000 emplo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00139.html (11,991 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Perfect Gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "Leo qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:59:54 -0500; Rupert, There was wide variance between men's language and decorum in frt service and passenger service. Generally passenger men were more reserved,and acted more professional. Part of it was the uni; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00145.html (10,696 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:19:12 -0400 (EDT); Well I guess you could say that..."some were and some weren't"...Some have observed over the years that you can't expect "gentlemanly" conduct when you put a man who has been "rassling boxcars for 40; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00146.html (12,741 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:42:45 +1200; I should have added that the railwaymen who are members of this List are obviously of the type that the VP was seeking! Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ| _____ Well I guess you could say that..."some were a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00147.html (12,969 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 19:47:08 -0700 (PDT); What about those of the Female gender? Yes there were a few of them too Steve in SC I should have added that the railwaymen who are members of this List are obviously of the type that the VP was s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00149.html (13,306 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:55:33 -0400 (EDT); There were no "trainpersons" of the female persuasion during my day. HOWEVER....There was one female crew caller....When you called the "callboy"...She always answered...."CALL GIRL"....I am not maki; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00150.html (14,026 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:01:21 +1200; The VP was only referring to "gentlemen". My apologies to any ex-railwaywomen who may be reading this. Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ _____ What about those of the Female gender? Yes there were a few of t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00151.html (13,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]