Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+PRR\-UP\s+power\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+PRR\-UP\s+power\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lsallee@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 10:55:01 -0600; Okay, now I've got another shot here I have questions about. Anyone know/guess/speculate about what this train might have been and why it would have had only PRR and UP power (and it looks like those; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00036.html (11,465 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr68@live.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 10:30:52 -0500; Larry, By late '66 or '67, a PRR-CB&Q-UP power pool from Conway (or Enola) to North Platte was in operation. I'm assuming it was an extension of sorts of the CB&Q-UP pool that started as early as '59; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00038.html (13,066 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Tom Lynch <thje@nntc.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:22:26 -0500; Okay, now I've got another shot here I have questions about. Anyone know/guess/speculate about what this train might have been and why it would have had only PRR and UP power (and it looks like thos; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00039.html (12,875 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Ray Bedard <tczephyr@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:18:51 -0700; With all the talk about foreign power on the Q, especially on the "race track" 'burbs, did any roads "rent" Q power to run trains on foreign roads? I am aware that some Q power took the Builder beyon; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00040.html (14,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]