Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+O\-5s\s+With\s+M\-4\s+Tenders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+O\-5s\s+With\s+M\-4\s+Tenders\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:23:21 -0600; All- A little late but Great Job on the O-5 with M-4 Tender Ken….. I cobbled together color photos of the same but the result was nowhere as convincing as your work! Thanks, Charlie __._,_.___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00096.html (13,931 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:49:58 -0500; November 20, 2015 Charlie - Now if Ken can PhotoShop some ash pans on to 5662's oil burning firebox and remove the stack heat trap flap, we'll have an even more "convincing" rendition of a proposed b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00098.html (14,492 bytes)
3. [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:13:34 -0500; November 4, 2015 Charlie and All - There was a recent post about a proposed third set of never constructed Class O-5 4-8-4 types that would've been equipped with long range tenders similar to those o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00191.html (12,678 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:52:10 -0500; November 5, 2015 Ken - WOW.... That's fascinating! An O-5's tender held 18,000 gallons of water and a M-4's held 21,500 gallons, so 5662 would've been able to skip some water plug stops. Also, I gues; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00202.html (15,387 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "'Kenneth L. Fleming' kf5632@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:16:29 -0500; Louis, Here is your what if of an O-5 with an M-4 tender. Looking at the folios for the two the M-4 is 5 inches longer and 3 inches shorter in height. The O-5 caries 27 ton of coal and the M-4 caries; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00203.html (14,209 bytes)
6. RE: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "'Nolen Null' NNull@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:41:08 -0500; __._,_.___ Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00204.html (20,399 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:50:50 -0500; November 6, 2015 You're right, 5662 has no ash pans, so has to be an oil burning Class O-5-B! You have sharp eyes to catch that. Since there never was an oil burning M-4-A (unless Charlie or Hol have; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00205.html (15,251 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:04:15 -0500; November 6, 2015 Nolen/Ken - I, too, was a little surprised by the very close dimensions and capacities comparing the O-5 and M-4 tenders. Just from appearances, I would've thought the M-4 tender was; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-11/msg00206.html (22,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]