BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders

To: "Kenneth Martin kmartin537@surewest.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders
From: "'Kenneth L. Fleming' kf5632@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:16:29 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1003.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=gmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmail.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1446765393; bh=PXVsw5XktLhp6sJFJesIRoI2ymsqLDE1eNESbc5gwYM=; h=To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=BEv1TMCgLJIKyyl+XoIIwVhuSOjM9pW7rfyTBbOC4Ej4pGfbtxfIzs5i2D14azVNKtVZhissh1MBMHyUYN/45DDM2r1XMPzqdxKCACzn1nq7Un7lXI1Y1W1Qh60opcK4ls6sdoppxLpFIm2nZtXC6JrpzFXGDhnVyOhsjIxxfoM=
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


This is a O5b. Try again. Find an M4b tender. Don't think there weren't any!


"Kenneth Martin kmartin537@surewest.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Louis,


Here is your what if of an O-5 with an M-4 tender. 

Looking at the folios for the two the M-4 is 5 inches longer and 3 inches shorter in height. The O-5 caries 27 ton of coal and the M-4 caries 24 ton of coal, so I am not sure it would have saved stops.

Ken Martin



On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ] wrote:

November 4, 2015
 
Charlie and All - There was a recent post about a proposed third set of never constructed Class O-5 4-8-4 types that would've been equipped with long range tenders similar to those on Class M-4 2-10-4 type locomotives. Can someone in this Group who is proficient with PhotoShop try and take some builders photos or other broadside photos of each class and see what an O-5 with an M-4 tender might've looked like. Sounds interesting.... Certainly would've cut out the need to stop for coal and water other than at division points thus increasing what today's railroaders call "velocity." Best Regards - Louis
 
Louis Zadnichek II
Fairhope, AL
 
     




__._,_.___

Posted by: "Kenneth L. Fleming" <kf5632@gmail.com>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>