BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] O-5s With M-4 Tenders
From: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:50:50 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1005.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1446832252; bh=TufrJlQWe0Qne2VwJhi0z0c5hOPUmFzAEfonevMOUL8=; h=To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=O3bJRkwDp4PyU59W94jYPPUVc1Xtt35E7R1INw7SblUZhAw68x6oliNtFk0/OKK1wVJ/2Oxq8q2pTKk16YCDPaoxT0NtFmGtAlbJEufzLvjMgbOJb6fOwr/cUvdYnzMsiyy+SDLDciIE8O07xScv9TbB8fmvs5zNPnPBaxfTWzM=
Full-name: LZadnichek
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


November 6, 2015
 
You're right, 5662 has no ash pans, so has to be an oil burning Class O-5-B! You have sharp eyes to catch that. Since there never was an oil burning M-4-A (unless Charlie or Hol have discovered conversion plans that never took place), it's back to PhotoShop for converting the M-4-A tender to hold oil instead of coal. And while on the subject of Photo Shop, wonder what an O-5 or M-4 would've looked like with an extended smoke box for burning lignite coal? Thanks - Louis    
 
In a message dated 11/5/2015 5:16:34 P.M. Central Standard Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes:


This is a O5b. Try again. Find an M4b tender. Don't think there weren't any!


"Kenneth Martin kmartin537@surewest.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Louis,


Here is your what if of an O-5 with an M-4 tender. 

Looking at the folios for the two the M-4 is 5 inches longer and 3 inches shorter in height. The O-5 caries 27 ton of coal and the M-4 caries 24 ton of coal, so I am not sure it would have saved stops.

Ken Martin



On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ] wrote:

November 4, 2015
 
Charlie and All - There was a recent post about a proposed third set of never constructed Class O-5 4-8-4 types that would've been equipped with long range tenders similar to those on Class M-4 2-10-4 type locomotives. Can someone in this Group who is proficient with PhotoShop try and take some builders photos or other broadside photos of each class and see what an O-5 with an M-4 tender might've looked like. Sounds interesting.... Certainly would've cut out the need to stop for coal and water other than at division points thus increasing what today's railroaders call "velocity." Best Regards - Louis
 
Louis Zadnichek II
Fairhope, AL
 
     




__._,_.___

Posted by: LZadnichek@aol.com



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>