Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+to\s+Modeling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+to\s+Modeling\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] New to Modeling (score: 1): Author: "Carl Davis" <cdmd4390@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:22:32 -0600; Hi to the group... My name is Carl and I am only now (well, three weeks ago) getting into the Hobby of Model Railroading.... I chose to model after the CB&Q, mainly because of the activity here, and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-11/msg00084.html (10,954 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] New to Modeling (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:10:01 -0500; Carl, welcome to the group. I trust you'll receive the same kind of help that I have over the years. I don't know that part of the route particularly well but can suggest that if LaCrosse is an area; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-11/msg00085.html (12,105 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] New to Modeling (score: 1): Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:10:51 -0500; Hey Carl, My advice would be to go N scale. I've been in HO for over 50 years. I love it -- it's fine, but for some time I've been aware that I could have so much more RR in N. I've been impressed wi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-11/msg00093.html (11,763 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] New to Modeling (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:29:00 -0600; Carl I got into N Scale to AVOID modeling the CB&Q!!! I was driving myself crazy in the mid-sixties trying to model the Q in HO....I had a LMB O1a which had been rebuilt by friend Pat Egan into the 4; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-11/msg00094.html (11,697 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]