- 1. [CBQ] Going to DCC...I think? (score: 1)
- Author: "jwestkohl" <kohlj@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:59:52 -0600
- I'm very tempted to go to DCC. It just seems smarter to run my layout that way. However... All my locomotives are non-DCC. I know that they can be done as DCC, but I have several questions. How much
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00146.html (8,980 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Going to DCC...I think? (score: 1)
- Author: William Hirt <whirt@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:16:51 -0800 (PST)
- I've had DCC now for 7 years. Take it from experience, the cheapest decoders are not always the ones you want. Many times problems will show up eventually and you'll have to toss them aside. Granted
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00147.html (11,057 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Going to DCC...I think? (score: 1)
- Author: "Simon Griffin" <SIMON_GRIF@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:43:09 -0600
- Hi Jan I switched to DCC about 2 years ago. DCC decoders vary in price from basic one function (Headlight on/off) for about $12.00 each to over $100 for sound decoders. Good multi function decoders g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00149.html (11,242 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Going to DCC...I think? (score: 1)
- Author: estaple10@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:30:48 EST
- Jan....... Bill and Simon have already given great input. I would add that you should keep in mind that if you have a large roster of locos, you will probably be converting them one or a few at a tim
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00150.html (10,092 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu