Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fire\s+Insurance\s+Efficiency\s+tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fire\s+Insurance\s+Efficiency\s+tests\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:50:55 -0400 (EDT); Steve et al...re efficiency tests....An efficiency test was, as all tests are, a measure of the knowledge and application of rules which are to be followed under a given set of conditions... The test; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00294.html (24,686 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:01:15 -0700 (PDT); Steve et al...re efficiency tests....An efficiency test was, as all tests are, a measure of the knowledge and application of rules which are to be followed under a given set of conditions... The tes; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00296.html (27,418 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:04:31 -0700 (PDT); Steve et al...re efficiency tests....An efficiency test was, as all tests are, a measure of the knowledge and application of rules which are to be followed under a given set of conditions... The tes; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00297.html (27,613 bytes)
4. Fwd: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:33:39 -0400 (EDT); As usual Pete has done a pretty complete job of covering the various types of efficiency tests. Keep in mind these were usually done on low density lines. For example I dont ever recall an efficiency; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00299.html (32,178 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:15:06 -0500 (CDT); Leo, random tests? I wonder, too. It was no secret about how some people left Savanna eastbound. I think it was all an early version of "don't ask, don't tell" and get the train over the road. I thin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00305.html (20,128 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:26:16 -0500 (CDT); Leo, rumor had it that there were "unoffical official" observations going on daily - that some regular passengers had been recruited to routinely watch. As usual Pete has done a pretty complete job; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00306.html (19,159 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:49:02 -0400 (EDT); RE: Leo's collector story...I was never involved in any passenger (suburban) train surveylance activity, being almost "chained to the chair" in traimaster's office at Blue Islnd dealling with the une; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00307.html (33,954 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:51:16 -0400 (EDT); RE signal tests...It was always my understanding on both the RI and Q that if you got by an absolute signal it was good for at least 6 months the first time...worse after 2nd and following Pete As us; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00308.html (31,744 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0000; Leo, random tests? I wonder, too. It was no secret about how some people left Savanna eastbound. I think it was all an early version of "don't ask, don't tell" and get the train over the road. I thin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00310.html (23,210 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Fwd: Fire Insurance Efficiency tests (score: 1): Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:13:48 -0700 (PDT); RE signal tests...It was always my understanding on both the RI and Q that if you got by an absolute signal it was good for at least 6 months the first time...worse after 2nd and following Pete As u; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00312.html (32,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]