- 1. [CBQ] Challenger 4-6-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ray Bedard" <tczephyr@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:37:19 -0700
- I have an opportunity to purchase a Challenger 4-6-4 #4001 (HO). Because of the high costs (a lot more than I should pay for it) I would like to get comments from others that have before making the i
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00167.html (10,051 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Challenger 4-6-4 (score: 1)
- Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:07:05 -0400
- Beautiful locomotive. Runs well. I have some 30" curves and had a little trouble there. I found that I had to eliminate some imperefect track work at the transition into one of the curves to make the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00168.html (11,303 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Challenger 4-6-4 (score: 1)
- Author: dhelec@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:02:59 EDT
- Gorgeous looker, smooth runner (watch for the sanding lines), fair puller. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Has someone you know been affected by
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00169.html (8,847 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Challenger 4-6-4 (score: 1)
- Author: Aeolus3@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:41:11 EDT
- Ray, To be honest the Challenger 4-6-4 looks great! Wonderful details... but if you want a Hudson that will pull more than just it's tender, try to find an older Sunset Hudson.The detail isn't as nic
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00170.html (9,226 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Challenger 4-6-4 (score: 1)
- Author: railbass@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 01:13:30 +0000
- I have a Nickel Plate CB&Q S-4a 4-6-4 #4001 that I bought several years ago for about $600. It is the finest product I have seen of NPP's inconsistent line, and it has a can motor and terrific detail
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00182.html (10,990 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu