Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Cab\s+Signals\s+$was\s+PRR\-UP\s+power$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Cab\s+Signals\s+$was\s+PRR\-UP\s+power$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power) (score: 1): Author: "thommack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:55:01 -0600; A friend of mine who is well acquainted with the Union Pacific brought up cab control signal (CCS) implications. This train would have needed UP style CCS from Grand Island to North Platte on the UP.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00134.html (12,745 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power) (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:36:33 -0600; As Jim Sandrin explained a couple of days ago, a UP pilot unit was added to the westbound train at Grand Island -- and removed there ont he eastbound trip. The Q did not have cab signals in any of it; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00135.html (14,921 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power) (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:40:32 +0000; A friend of mine who is well acquainted with the Union Pacific brought up cab control signal (CCS) implications. This train would have needed UP style CCS from Grand Island to North Platte on the UP.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00136.html (14,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]