Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CZ\s+Consist\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CZ\s+Consist\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CZ Consist (score: 1): Author: railbass@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:11:15 +0000; I too have my eye on the new BWL CZ cars, but one question that has not been answered yet is the breakdown of the consist by road. I am modeling the 1950 period when the CZ was brand new and realize; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00156.html (9,501 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CZ Consist (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rswebber@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:02:21 -0600; Foreign cars were not unusual in the 50's - especially those from NYC & PRR. Remember that the PRR shared Union with the Q, so those movements were much easier. In fact, if you look at the foreign ca; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00157.html (13,061 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] CZ Consist (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:35:30 EST; I was always told by Q fans that the original CZ cars broke down as 3-2-1, in other words 3 sets of equipment for the Burlington, 2 for the WP, and 1 for the DRG&W. This is not the case for all the c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00165.html (10,961 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] CZ Consist (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:11:15 -0600; I don't think that foreign Pullmans were designed to be in the train from inception.... I think that the NYC leasing the D&RGW car and PRR owning Silver Rapids fulfilled their share of the pooled mil; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00170.html (9,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]