Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+divisions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+divisions\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: "fastmail57" <jppjharper@cs.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:33:12 -0600; I have been trying to determine the boundries of several divisions in the late 1940s. Can anyone with a collection of employee timetables from that period furnish the division point between the Linco; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-12/msg00192.html (8,880 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:03:00 -0600; There are 40's versions of every CB&Q employee timetable at www.thevlbg.com Site is not very up to date but I know that the timetables are there. I have been trying to determine the boundries of seve; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-12/msg00193.html (9,422 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:13:49 -0600; As an interesting aside the dividing point between the Lincoln and McCook Divisions in the mid 40's was between Kenesaw and Heartwell. Why is that interesting? When Digicon set up the currently used; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-12/msg00194.html (9,750 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: drale99@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:14:22 EST; Ravenna was and is the division point between Lincoln and Alliance. What a place that used to be! Ravenna was once a great railroader's town. Many train crews lived there. That small town (pop. 1800); /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-12/msg00253.html (8,888 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: "Gary Northrup" <gnorthrup@netonecom.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 09:18:46 -0500; Why were Chryslers the auto of choice for crews? Did the not like G.M. for some reason having to do with the EMD equipment? Gary Cadillac, Mi. -- Original Message -- From: <drale99@aol.com> To: <CBQ@; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-01/msg00000.html (10,342 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:25:02 -0600; All: While this thread got headed in the Chrysler direction the original subject was "CB&Q Divisions". To clarify and bring up to the present day: Do not understand what you mean by: "A Division Poin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-01/msg00007.html (12,593 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: Don L Zinnecker <dzinnecker@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:40:37 -0600; Other Divisional changes: Beginning yesterday, UP took over dispatching the former CB&Q line between College View (in Southeast Lincoln) and Arbor from the KYLE.....although with the coal trains no l; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-01/msg00011.html (9,636 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q divisions (score: 1): Author: drale99@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:20:45 EST; My reference to Chryslers had only to do with the railroaders in Ravenna. I'm curious as to whether railroad men in other places preferred Cryslers. My point was that I was always empressed because C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-01/msg00023.html (9,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]