Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Burlington\s+Locomotives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Burlington\s+Locomotives\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "Bob Rees" <reventures_61061@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:08:49 -0600; I am modeling a CB&Q Zephyr and I am looking for a prototype E7B. Did the Burlington have E7B locomotives in their inventory? -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00051.html (9,216 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:41:39 EST; While some of the Burlington E7's carried a "B" suffix in their number, the were in fact "A" Units, in other words they had a cab. The Burlington didn't own any E7,E8,or E9 "B" Units. The only E "B"; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00053.html (9,266 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rswebber@concentric.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:56:01 -0600; Which is why you always see them running Elephant style. Here is another example of the Q being smarter in using their money. B units for this application for a railroad like the CB&Q just didn't mak; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00054.html (10,875 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 03:48:54 EST; There is another reason I forgot to mention, with all "cab" units or motors as they were called on the Q, the railroad would check the mileage on all the E's thus placing them into Suburban Service t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00063.html (9,482 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:43:41 -0600; The C&NW was, if anything, CHEAPER than the CB&Q (which is why it was called the Cheap and Nothing Wasted). The B units that were rebuilt into As (the "Crandel" sp? cabs) were ex-UP units purchased a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00080.html (10,122 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:49:29 +1300; flexiblity of having -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers. At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide! http://us.click.yahoo.com/EpW3eD/3MnJA; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00113.html (10,160 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:53:43 +1300; Charlie Was this part of the reason for "converting" the TR-2B's to NW-2's? Rupert Gamlen flexiblity of having -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> What would our lives be like without music, dance, and t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00114.html (10,089 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "East Pass" <EastPass@19main.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:45:27 -0600; Rupert, The TR2's were purchased for two reasons. 1. As branchline power on lines with grades. 2. CB&Q was convinced by EMD that the two unit sets were the only proper thing to replace 0-8-0's in hea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00118.html (11,223 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]