Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Another\s+signal\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Another\s+signal\s+question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:49:46 -0500 (EST); Gene: I'm going to "go out on a limb" and be subject to correction...or maybe ridicule from those more knowledgable than I...but here's what i am going to postulate. You will note that the blades are; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00055.html (13,146 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:29:38 -0800 (PST); This is just a guess, but I think Superior may have been a joint agency. I don't remember if was with the UP, the MP or some other road. The top signal was the Q TO board and the lower signal may hav; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00056.html (10,668 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: Mike <havremt2002@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:52:15 -0800 (PST); ATSF ran into Superior.<a href="https://overview.mail.yahoo.com?.src=iOS"><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad</a>; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00057.html (10,233 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 23:10:29 -0500 (EST); John: I thought of that possibility also...Both the CNW...Santa Fe...and MP operated into Superior....HOWEVER the MP never ran over the Q tracks...they crossed the Q west of town...Both CNW and ATSF; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00058.html (11,615 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: GLEN <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:55:15 -0800; As part of my signal research, I found references to the use of 2 blade train order signals as early as 1892 on Lines East between Aurora and Burlington. I seem to recall that there were specific ins; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00061.html (11,499 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Another signal question (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:58:03 -0500 (EST); Glen et al...Thanks Glen your thinking kind of confirms what I was trying to say...I just "pulled it out of the air"...so to speak and what you have stated confirms what I was thinking...I'm familiar; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00063.html (12,362 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]