Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Allied\s+Trucks\s+On\s+Wood\s+Box\s+Cars\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Allied\s+Trucks\s+On\s+Wood\s+Box\s+Cars\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] Allied Trucks On Wood Box Cars? (score: 1): Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:03:15 +1200; Louis The only CB&Q box cars I know of that were equipped for passenger service were XM-32 and XM-33 – no single sheathed ones. Rupert From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] Sen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-08/msg00123.html (16,155 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Allied Trucks On Wood Box Cars? (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:07:31 -0400; August 18, 2015 Rupert - OK, then that means the two wood box cars and following passenger car consist were most likely an off-line troop train interchanged to the Q in Chicago. Thanks - Louis In a m; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-08/msg00125.html (16,463 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Allied Trucks On Wood Box Cars? (score: 1): Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:22:36 -0500; __._,_.___ Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-08/msg00126.html (15,367 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Allied Trucks On Wood Box Cars? (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:32:11 -0600; And whether the trucks are Allied or not, the cars are DEFINITELY not Q; the Q had no single-sheathed boxcars with the diagonal bracing sloped in the direction seen on these cars. This question came; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-08/msg00129.html (15,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]