Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Strange\s+hump\s+on\s+2\-10\-4\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Strange\s+hump\s+on\s+2\-10\-4\.\.\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: jkohl <jkohl@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:55:45 -0700 (PDT); Upon my inspection of the pics I posted yesterday myself, I noticed something strange with 2-10-4 #6323. The first picture is of it in 1960, so obviously near the end of it's life. The first picture; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00064.html (9,894 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "John Robert Adams" <steamera@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:54:05 -0500; Jan; Actually, you have the chronology reversed. When built, the domes were spaced on opposite sides of the steam dome and the rear sand dome was moved forward in the late 1930's or or early 1940's.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00065.html (11,424 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: jkohl <jkohl@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:15:27 -0700 (PDT); Hmmmm...strange, as the photo caption states that it is 1960 for the first picture. I'll have to double check that, as that engine may have been scrapped by that time. However, the engine certainly; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00066.html (10,056 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:45:30 +1200; According to Bulletin #35 page 125 "All 18 M-4's were rebuilt into higher speed engines, classified M-4-A, in the 1930's. At about this same time, the rear sand dome was moved forward to a position b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00073.html (11,561 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: jkohl <jkohl@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 06:28:55 -0700 (PDT); higher<BR> time,<BR> sand<BR> Thanks, Rupert! Well, that gives me a certain "prior to" date for that first picture, which is incorrect from what was actually listed on the back! The 2nd one then may; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00074.html (10,223 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:46:20 -0500; Jan, Generally sand domes were moved to get shorter pipe runs that were less likely to clog up or to transfer weight forwards or backwards to balance the distribution of weight on drivers. higher<BR>; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00075.html (11,012 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:35:21 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00076.html (11,627 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00077.html (11,885 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "Bob Weber" <eng95@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:38:55 -0700; And the reason the Q took them all out of service at that point is because that's when I quit railroading and no longer had to eat the cinder ballast they stirred up while handing up train orders to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00078.html (10,431 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:10:27 EDT; John - You're referring to "regular service", right? The 6315 double headed with the 5632 on an excursion Cicero to Galesburg September 6, 1959, (which I rode). Bob Campbell [Non-text portions of thi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00082.html (9,769 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:36:44 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00092.html (10,623 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "Norm Andersen" <Norm_Andersen@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:55:50 -0400; I do believe I was on that trip too. Wasn't that when the 6315 threw an eccentric rod on the engineer's side? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00095.html (10,910 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] Strange hump on 2-10-4... (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:53:00 -0500; I was on the Westbound platform at Brookfield when the doubleheader came through at speed....I am sure glad the 6315 didn't throw its eccentric rod there!!! Would have wiped out my trusty Evans 26 in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00104.html (12,154 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]