Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Signals\s+and\s+Stuff\,Lenny\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Signals\s+and\s+Stuff\,Lenny\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 20:58:22 EDT; Hello, I'm hoping that some of you dispatchers, operators, or C&E's can help me out. On the Peoria Sub in the 50's and early 60's the Q used a manual block system on this "dark territory." In the tim; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00004.html (7,171 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@a...; Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:27:42 EDT; Yes, a clearance form and/or orders could be hooped up at that station. The train could not "pass' the station w/o a clearance beyond that point. In some cases if the operator at the station was goin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00006.html (7,116 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: vlbg <vlbg@s...>; Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 07:38:19 -0500; Ken: I think I answered this question when it was asked in regards to Keokuk. The combination of wording in the Timetable like the above means that for all intents and purposes the absent train order; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00015.html (9,274 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 18:25:58 EDT; Leo and Russ, Thank you very much for your replies. This has made things much clearer. My next question would be is when did radios start to become a factor dispatching wise? Was it "legal" to receiv; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00018.html (7,217 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@a...; Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 22:42:19 EDT; All thru the 70s it was common for the DS to come on the radio to the C&E of a train to copy a freshly issued slow order. Leo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00029.html (6,622 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Signals and Stuff,Lenny (score: 1): Author: vlbg <vlbg@s...>; Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 00:58:12 -0500; Ken: A train order transmitted by radio did not need a clearance. I was not working a train order job in the early 70's so I don't know when radio transmission started up but I think that is the righ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00032.html (8,529 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]