Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Oil\s+or\s+coal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Oil\s+or\s+coal\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Re: Oil or coal (score: 1): Author: "wrjensen" <Wrjensen@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:35:35 -0600; I not sure about all of it but I will give my silly answer. At Denver you would not see many/any FW&D Steam locos. Most of the time Steam power would have been pulled off and switch to C&S at Texline; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00083.html (9,709 bytes)
2. [BRHSlist] Re: Oil or coal (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:25:14 -0800; Jonathan -- A quick perusal of the 1952 list of assignments in Corbin & Kerka (Steam Locomotives of the Burlington Route) shows mostly coal-fired engines in both the Denver and Kansas City areas; the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00090.html (11,974 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Oil or coal (score: 1): Author: dhelec@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:24:17 EST; Lines West (west of Pacific Junction, Iowa) is where there were a lot, if not the majority of the oil-burners. Denver, KC, Omaha, Wyoming, were the home turfs of the oil burning O classes and S class; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00092.html (8,505 bytes)
4. [BRHSlist] Re: Oil or Coal (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@EarthLink.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:09:30 -0600; I would agree with your assessments except for KC. Most if not all of Q's operations in KC were handled by coal burning locomotives, both north as well as eastbound. Other RRs into KC (remember there; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00106.html (9,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]