Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+HO\s+models\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+HO\s+models\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: SilvrDome@a...; Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:56:12 EST; Bob, I think the only variation for Budd roofs was pre-war vs. post-war. Also UP had the wire and cable duct down the center of their 1960 Budd Coaches. Most every short dome shared similar roofs, fr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00047.html (7,354 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:30:38 -0600; Broadway Limited is tooling several variations. The unit numbers picked were small numberboard units for the Q as well as the GN. More units will be done in the future...if the sales warrant it. Not; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00050.html (11,759 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: Don L Zinnecker <dzinnecker@j...>; Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:42:14 -0600; Charlie, Please encourage Broadway to do several variations! I will most most likely purchase both small numberboard, black stripe and large numberboard, red stripe versions! Looking forward to these; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00055.html (12,952 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:04:45 -0600; As I said, I am sure they will....there are at least 6 different Q versions that can be done.... if everbody buys the first version, the second, third, etc.. will not be far behind. Charlie; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00056.html (14,664 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:09:23 EST; Well there were two basic roofs pre war and post war...... along with the variations of the domes. But the Budd Roof was of a standard design. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00059.html (8,693 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:55:30 -0600; Not true. There were at least five or six prewar roof styles and a couple of variations on postwar cars. The Budd drawings are very poor on showing the full layout... to do the Kato cars I had to cob; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00067.html (10,507 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:16:58 -0600; Again, check your photos....some of the Es ran right up to the end in black stripes if I remember correctly. Charlie -- Original Message -- From: "thommack" <mack@c...> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00068.html (17,554 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Gregory Myers" <myers.gregory@w...>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:22:03 -0500; Heard a rumor that Broadway would be getting the E unit locomotive bodies from Proto2000 - anyone know if this is true? If so, it might be possible to change over a red nose stripe unit from the earl; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00071.html (17,660 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 20:36:45 -0600; NOT TRUE! Broadway Limited is tooling brand new bodies in a completely different factory. This is a brand new locomotive from the wheels up. No recycling. Charlie http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00072.html (19,675 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 22:07:15 EST; Charlie, With Tony having run OL, I'm sure he will do a better job on the nose than Proto 2000 did. I, too, will be waiting to buy many of these sound equipt units. Maybe he could be convinced to do; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00073.html (8,612 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:44:51 -0600; NolenBad choice of words.... piggybacking, ridesharing, borrowing.....whatever. New shell, new locomotive. Charlie; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00074.html (8,978 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:47:41 -0600; RichSince the numbers are just in the numberboards and in very small numbers in the center of the unit that are easily decaled over, I don't think the unnumbered unit is worthwhile for the Q consider; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00075.html (9,960 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 07:14:32 EST; Charlie, I had forgotten how easy it would be to change, since the Q didn't plaster big numbers all over their motors (unlike, say GM&O). I didn't realize that these unlettered sets sell so poorly -; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00076.html (8,499 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:07:16 -0600; Rich and List.... truly We live in Good Times when we can choose to trade dollars for our ever-more precious time... I don't share in the dismay (not saying you are wailing and knashing your teeth, b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00100.html (8,712 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:06:22 EST; Charlie, Agree with every you say here. I'm just irritated that especially brass manufacturers have gone to only set groupings with set names/numbers/paint schemes. Take it or leave it. What if I wan; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00119.html (8,932 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:56:56 EST; If this is what Broadway's going to do I hope they at least fix the pilot..... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00122.html (8,051 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:01:34 EST; Of the later E units, 7-9's the Q had the least number of the E's with the small number board. And if I remember they were never retrofitted with the larger "F" unit type number baords. And they also; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00123.html (7,560 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:20:23 EST; RTR vs Kits...... One of my grips about the RTR is the fact that you still have to take the cars apart to change out couplers and wheel sets, ect. Walthers has a couple of people builging their RTR's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00124.html (8,279 bytes)
19. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:55:30 -0600; Please note that it has already been posted that Broadway Limited is using ALL NEW TOOLING for their E-7s..... made in a different factory brand new from the wheels up. Charlie bodies the pilot.....; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00128.html (9,038 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]