Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Q\s+GP7\/9s\s+in\s+Passenger\s+service\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Q\s+GP7\/9s\s+in\s+Passenger\s+service\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: "baton580" <rplaehn@cox-internet.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:59:07 -0600; I understand that some of the Burlington GP-7 units were delivered with steam boilers and could be used in passenger service. What runs did these units frequent and were they ever used in M.U. with E; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00082.html (9,428 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: Jim's Junction/ John & Debbie Olson <trains28@bresnan.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 20:02:07 -0600; Bob, I believe all the GP-7 & GP-9 units were delivered with Steam Generators as well as most of the SD-7 & SD-9 units. Only the SD-9s units ('s' for single controls) were delivered without Steam Gen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00083.html (10,696 bytes)
3. RE: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: "Scott Manley" <scott.manley@smsooland.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 07:59:33 -0500; Bob, I believe all the GP-7 & GP-9 units were delivered with Steam Generators as well as most of the SD-7 & SD-9 units. Only the SD-9s units ('s' for single controls) were delivered without Steam Gen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00084.html (11,189 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: <bradslaney@wizard.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:08:18 -0700; I remember a GP9 was used on the North Coast Limited from Lacrosse to Savanna when the E9s failed. Another unit was added at Savanna for the run into Chicago. This was in June 1958. BRAD -- Yahoo! Gr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00085.html (10,215 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:59:52 EDT; I've seen pictures of GP7/9's in use on 29-30...Denver Alliance Trains....They were used on KC Omaha Trains 27-26 and probably 22-23...in the 60's...In my time seeing these trains almost daily...pre; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00086.html (9,461 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:03:49 EDT; SD 7's 400-411 were made especially for branch line service and were "lightweight"...smaller fuel tanks and no steam generators....They were dual controls though. I worked Fairmont (NE) - Hildreth lo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00087.html (9,380 bytes)
7. RE: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: "Scott Manley" <scott.manley@smsooland.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:09:04 -0500; SD 7's 400-411 were made especially for branch line service and were "lightweight"...smaller fuel tanks and no steam generators....They were dual controls though. I worked Fairmont (NE) - Hildreth lo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00088.html (10,437 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: Jim's Junction/ John & Debbie Olson <trains28@bresnan.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:01:06 -0600; Scott, I forgot about the #400-411 SD-7s not having steam generators. I did see #29 & 30 (Denver-Billings) running with SD-9's on rare occasions and SD-9's were frequently used on Alliance-Casper pas; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00095.html (12,812 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Q GP7/9s in Passenger service (score: 1): Author: Paul Kossart <kozys@insightbb.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 21:34:21 -0500; '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' Bob, IIRC, I saw a couple pics in the color books of one of these pulling the Chicago-Galesburg local. It was always the same number,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00097.html (10,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]