Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Digest\s+Number\s+1689\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Digest\s+Number\s+1689\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@E...>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 01:12:56 -0500; I have two and they suck! If they weren't the only Q pacifics, I'd get rid of them. Bill Barber Got to be the Milwaukee northerns, The only S-2 was LMB.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00121.html (7,626 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: "Ray Bedard" <tczephyr@h...>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 09:02:19 -0700; I have an LMB 4-6-2, as does Bill Glick. I bought mine when they first came out, list price was $49.99 but I got mine for $40.00. Both of ours have the original motors, and other than being a little; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00123.html (8,666 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@y...>; Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 23:48:09 -0700 (PDT); _________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00129.html (9,517 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 23:42:33 +0000; I have recently acquired an LMB S-2 4-6-2, and it is a smooth runner and relatively quiet, despite the outside-frame motor. My only concern with this model is that it is equipped with a Delta trailin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00148.html (9,806 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 23:37:20 -0700; John -- I don't know about the Rushton (outside-frame) trailing truck, but I can't believe somebody doesn't make'em. If not, you should be able to pull one off a non-brass engine of some sort. You al; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00152.html (8,350 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:06:32 +0000; Jonathan - The F-3As, 350-354, did not have Rushton trailing trucks, as did the heavier F- 3Bs and F-3Cs, 370-375, based on the Q S-3 class - or the USRA type, as suggested by one lister. The F-3As s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00165.html (10,150 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1689 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:27:12 -0700; Oops, ... red-face syndrome. I'm wrong, you're right, and bless your rivets too! Don't know where I got the notion it was a Rushton truck (obviously not from any meticulous study of photos or plans).; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00169.html (7,302 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]