Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Commuter\s+operations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Commuter\s+operations\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Commuter operations (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@a...; Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 23:14:06 EDT; Ed, I don't know but I'll find out. I suspect the Cond. had to be in the car at each stop. I rode them as a passenger but never "worked" 'em.I can tell you from experience that the power cars were al; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-05/msg00010.html (6,628 bytes)
2. RE: [BRHSlist] Commuter operations (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <charlie@k...>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 08:02:36 -0500; I don't remember ever seeing the traps up on any of the power cars (I commuted from Brookfield, then later Lisle, Belmont in the sixties and early seventies). I don't think the regular steel commuter; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-05/msg00012.html (8,111 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Commuter operations (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 13:22:53 EDT; My recollections are that when they were "worked" (90% of the time), traps and doors were latched for use by passengers and not opened/closed from stop to stop. They were always the "smoker". Cummins; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-05/msg00021.html (7,179 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Commuter operations (score: 1): Author: Ed Pavlovic <epav1@w...>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 23:25:38 -0500; I'd like to thank the list members that responded to my questions on the operations of the power cars used with the Q's gallery cars. It does seem to make sense that the crews would prefer to use the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-05/msg00056.html (7,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]