Let's not get nick picking. I agree with Gordon, this was strickley a request for information that in the long run will be of great help to all of us. How many people would delete this email if the t
BRHSlisters, We have a case here where our list moderator was trying to send me a personal email and accidentally posted it to the list. We all (me included) need to be more careful to double check t
Dave, I agree, and I'm sure most others will as well, with your interpretation of the new policy. I'd suggest, if in doubt, let it be posted. Not too many of us are likely to be offended at a few mar
Author: Jim's Junction/ John & Debbie Olson <trains28@a...>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 17:45:36 -0600
I've seen enough! The bickering is going to get totally out of hand nowsince this 'commercialism' stuff started. There are some of us who are in the group because of our love for the CB&Q/C&S/FW&D an
Jim and listeesI agree. I haven't EVER found any objectionable material on this list, and if a discussion or message doesn't interest me I use the <Delete> thingie which works well on my machine. Cha
LIST I agree!!! Blatant commercialism is one thing, (and we all know what it is), but the request for information is part of the free exchange of ideas, that his list and the BRHS in general is all a
I didn't object to talking about related non-Burlington lines.... I would welcome any insight into how the Q interrelated to such competing/parallel lines.... my mythical railroad also parallels/comp