Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CB\&Q\s+169A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CB\&Q\s+169A\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q 169A (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:51:49 -0600; Sharp eye, Russ! Those are the style applied to very late F7s and F9s.... must be a spot replacement. Have no idea what the other side looked like when the left side got those louvers. Charlie -- Ori; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00262.html (7,405 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q 169A (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:53:55 +0000; F7A #169 was a Phase I F7 with four horizontal louver sets in the carbody side panel. It appears that three of the four sets have been folded down and closed for some reason, but the fourth set has b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00270.html (8,523 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q 169A (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:50:56 -0600; John, Good report. That make sense. They did look to be horizontal, rather than vertical, didn't know they could be moved. As you start looking at shot from the 70's a lot of F's do not have any carb; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00271.html (10,021 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q 169A (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:33:47 -0600; Those louvers are not operable. They are formed fixed louvers. The vertical slit jobs are replacements of the entire panel between the battens. Probably the unit was sideswiped or involved in some ot; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00272.html (9,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]