Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Bituminous\s+vs\.\s+Lignite\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Bituminous\s+vs\.\s+Lignite\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: Steve Wintner <steve_wintner@y...>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:46:03 -0700 (PDT); Hi all, As I said I was going to do before, I've looked over Corbin and Kerka. According to them, none of the Burlingtons steamers had a Coffin feedwater heater (FWH), and quickly perusing the pictur; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00097.html (8,013 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:51:05 -0800; Steve -- There is a picture on p. 117 of Corbin and Kerka showing 0-3 # 5320 with a Coffin FWH. Says these were applied to 3 others of that class and later removed. The list of locomotive assignments; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00099.html (8,800 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:07:15 EDT; Several of the O3 mikes had Coffin FWH's. Check out engine 5320 of Corbin's book on page 117. It says four of this class received this type of FWH but that they were later removed. The authors also m; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00104.html (6,718 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: "muffie" <muffie@i...>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:02:46 -0500; A belated additional comment: Locomotives equipped to burn lignite were marked with a 12" yellow square at the rear of the coal bunker. (This is included in the Burlington Steam set I designed for Mi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00223.html (6,878 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]