BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] CB&Q STOCK YARDS

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q STOCK YARDS
From: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 21:19:16 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1601864362; bh=jwuBEn0B2HNjEoBLWRXsd+Vfs8oTW5gDb6i3g5DRLcQ=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=h9GCmgx2QNo56zN4T9mLsUbSKZbpc4rJCSj82LyfPSQloIOp354OTkBkPGBebci8RdQ NHwgBLxI/iidsECTGEZ3UVm0T7Z8DED+LYJOkKrBI/IVAxMf7iLPsQqd1mxQ6rWyFriwa +Ne3JCsEEcLwn4V74N2r1QDl939WbPiekYo=
In-reply-to: <0dbf01d69a9d$a3f53f30$ebdfbd90$@gmail.com>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <0dbf01d69a9d$a3f53f30$ebdfbd90$@gmail.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Further details on Montgomery and livestock resting yards in general.

Few know that the site of the Q’s Montgomery stock operation had been a Q gravel pit until converted in the 1910s.. watch the BRHS Bulletin for a future article entitled “That Good Aurora Gravel” about all the gravel spurs in the Q’s Aurora division. While cattle were certainly handled at Montgomery an equal or larger number of sheep were handled. Sheep shearers at Montgomery were some of the highest paid guys in town.

Other RR layover yards around Chicago:

CNW-West Chicago and La Fox. Yes, La Fox,I have the photos, plat maps And some building drawings. Someday there will be an article in Nothwestern lines. No cattle were handled at La Fox, only sheep and the predecessors to internal combustion power. They were measured one horse power at a time.
IHB- yes, the IHB at Blue Island.
CGW-Sycamore.
Etc,etc,etc.

I did remember my involvement with Montgomery setting out range feeder cattle on the sheep yard lead in the mid 70s. One night in particular on a January night and all of -20. I also recall spotting feeders at Polo,IL at around 2AM in a driving rain and hoping the farmers were there to unload so I didn’t have the pleasure. They were !

LeoPhillipp


On Oct 4, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Douglas Harding <iowacentralrr@gmail.com> wrote:



My understanding is the Montgomery was the Q’s feed and rest station leading into Chicago from the west. Every railroad running into Chicago from the west had a feed and rest station in Illinois, most within 50-100 miles of Union Stockyards. A feed and rest station means this is where “slaughter cows” had their last meal, you might say, before arrival in Chicago. But not all animals stopped at Montgomery, some went direct to the Union Stockyards in Chicago and adjacent slaughter houses, if the timing of the stock train allowed their arrival without a stop. Galesburg was further away from Chicago.

 

A feed and rest station is used by the railroad to meet the stipulations of the 28 hour law, which required that animals be unloaded, fed, watered, and allowed to rest for 5 hours, after 28 hours of travel in a stockcar. The law could be waived by the animals owner to allow for transit time of 36 hours, where upon the animals had to be rested a minimum of 8 hours. 36 hours was the max for any animal transit without rest. (as a side note truckers had no such law until sometime in the 1990s, one reason they took livestock traffic from the railroads.) Feed and rest stations were spaced so that stock trains could cover a given distance within the allotted 28 hours. Along the Q mainline you will note Creston and Lincoln are set up to handle large number of animals, not because these towns were major livestock centers, but because they could be used as feed and rest stations. Major livestock centers typically had a union stockyard that was served by multiple railroads and fed adjoining slaughter houses. You will not find a listing for South Omaha, Kansas City or St Louis on the spreadsheet Nolan shared, because these location were served by union stockyards.

 

A feed and rest station was set up to accommodate a large number of animals, while keeping each car load separated from other animals. In the steam era a stock train could be 50 cars, and each pen was sized to hold one two cars worth of animals. The separation was especially important when dealing with disease, but separation also ensured an owner did not have his animals mixed with others, ie good stock get mixed or replaced with poor stock. Not every animal had an identification tag or brand. Separation in cars and pens was the only way owners retained control over their animals.

 

Note most of the stock pen locations only had a handful of pens, often only 2-4 which was just enough for the local needs of farmers shipping livestock. They were not large enough to handle an entire train of livestock.

 

A feed and rest station was also used by owners to “hold” animals while waiting for a better price or to put on some weight after a long period of roundup, trail drives and travel. Well rested and fat cattle garnered better prices, compared to rangy skinny cattle. So an owner might hold animals for a week or two at the feed and rest station.

 

Doug Harding

www.iowacentralrr.org

 

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of Tom Hammer
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2020 10:50 AM
To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: [CBQ] CB&Q STOCK YARDS

 

I was actually thinking slaughter cows.

I am using Galesburg as one location that would be a good Feeder Cow sales location.?

For slaughter cows, if the Q was part of Union Stock Yards in Chicago?

Or if Aurora was a holding yard for slaughter cows awaiting the trip to Chicago?

I think West Chicago was named as a holding yard for slaughter cows, but I am afraid that was on the CNW?

Trying to have correct names on my HO R><R.

Tom Hammer

_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#60495) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>