Re: [CBQ] Autoparts Movement

["Joel McCurry via groups.io" <mtnsouth=aol.com@groups.io>]

Did the Q actually benefit from actual traffic of the auto parts cars (86 footers) over its' territories/ Or did they only get per diem fron the cars?

Joel McCurry

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Zadnichek via groups.io <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
To: CBQ@groups.io
Sent: Wed, Aug 19, 2020 11:57 am
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Autoparts Movement

August 19, 2020

Fred - Such an article would be perfect for either the BRHS Bulletin or Zephyr - Louis

Louis Zadnichek II

Fairhope, AL 

In a message dated 8/19/2020 10:41:16 AM Central Standard Time, whirt@fastmail.com writes:

Fred,

Thank you for the write up. Informative as always!

Bill Hirt

On 8/18/2020 5:14 PM, Fred Crissey wrote:

After several weeks of research and trying to recall some of details on the who, what, where and why of CBQ 86ft High Cube Box cars I have finally got it done.  It was 56 years ago (1964) that the cars were built.  With 20/20 hindsight it appears to have been a poor investment but at the time the Burlington had no choice.  The positive side is that it wasn't that many cars and we did not lose as much as several other railroads.

If your interested I can put together something about 60ft parts cars, frame flats, and some very different bi-level auto racks that the Burlington had.

Fred Crissey

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#60207) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_