BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Numbering of Burlington passenger trains

To: cbq@groups.io
Subject: [CBQ] Numbering of Burlington passenger trains
From: "Randal O'Toole" <rot@ti.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:13:44 -0700
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1589822035; bh=a2/kRWlwbN8wdKqJEjJr7XTnWNtLdhH4IQCsa1vnPX4=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=eUbmpB7Yw/McPCVdcbI5njpHNfSlqwn7eq0f5TvZXtdQ1Tna4OVy+edofgEx+NlKHCp z8YgSoEwYkeuZTylBIpkPHEwXK0qutsvq3DzxDCfYpYg4faOSw7QVaRhqG+LzxNP3QY/1 Oaa6s5WOlQUs+LVB6REi2N2jkCGaRn5ocP8=
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Hi,

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but does anyone know why Burlington had such an odd way of numbering its passenger trains? From the 1960 timetable:

Denver Zephyr: trains 1 & 10
Chicago-Galesburg coach train: 2 and 15
Ak-Sar-Ben Zephyr: 3 & 30
The Coloradan: 6 & 19
Zephyr-Rocket: 8 & 15 (a different 15)

In that year, Burlington had no trains 4 or 5 (C&S had a train 4, but its trains were numbered separately).

Why not trains 1 & 2, 3 & 4, etc. like most other railroads?

Randal O’Toole
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#59544) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>