BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Power on #83 and PU

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Power on #83 and PU
From: "Leo Phillipp via Groups.Io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 19:15:09 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1559434518; bh=30pSuS4GVosFEXWV7XDfZ9dMPi0F17EfhBniDg3YCHc=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=MB//ItZEJnnFJzdsvzPxl4ykBr8tbHBoi4domFMEMULGmuS4nyjqkRcCOy5/wL9CX2l nC0r8sy6S6Ax9Zkl0Ixv7zh158qgi15/o+6P0lSPzhOGVDRog/U1uaGel3T7WLaVTKuvz C+qrjhX1k3ylKZCqeEh9eCRTRYnM1zjqzwM=
In-reply-to: <7030.1559428217551966099@groups.io>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <7030.1559428217551966099@groups.io>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Bob,

I think others on the group will agree that power on the C&I was F units with an occasional GP7 or SD7/9 spliced into the middle of the consist. Of course #97 the "hot" train got better/newer power.

Overall the "mainline" got the new stuff.

Leo Phillipp

On Jun 1, 2019, at 5:30 PM, Robert Herrick <rdherrick@gmail.com> wrote:

Can anyone tell me the typical power assigned to PU and #83 on the C&I in the 60s and how big these trains were?

Bob Herrick
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#57429) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>