[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

Subject: Re: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG
From: "Charlie [CBQ]" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:16:22 -0600
Authentication-results:; domainkeys=neutral (no sig);; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: mailing list
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=echoe; t=1510938990; bh=hXWgnGgd0ngauM0obny8PYkTKEhuEI5dxWWSnwWCBps=; h=References:In-Reply-To:To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=QGEWzH65lBYwGb8QCT/cxYw1ZibrJDyv0Vbme/nZRCZTMgNDRiAsMZAqO9iQSp6vZ9I8q82Wxckac4WBGZalXHexehT2jc5TOMi21/RUFjUkbNLew8AaGb7VZN/9OTSG0BzMRaN4vz7qz5VmoO9jgaEF/PebL7riML7uqh+b73M=
In-reply-to: <>
List-id: <>
List-unsubscribe: <>
Mailing-list: list; contact
References: <> <>

Or O-5-HE (Hydro-Electric)
Charlie Vlk

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 17, 2017, at 12:53 AM, Rupert Gamlen [CBQ] <> wrote:



Go one stage further and bring it right up to date, powering it with really clean steam, with a Class O-5-WT (wind turbine) or Class O-5-SC (solar cell).

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ


From: []
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:08 a.m.
Subject: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG


November 14, 2017


Group - Remembering the coal burning Class O-5-A and oil burning Class O-5-B 4-8-4's, had the Q remained independent of the BN and stayed with steam power, then, perhaps, in this day and age we would've seen a Class O-5-LNG.......



Even though an LNG burning 4-8-4 would've sounded the same, I think I'd miss the smoke and cinders or soot. Just wouldn't be quite the same with burning liquefied natural gas.....  But, "Clean Steam" does have a nice ring to it, don't you agree - Louis


Louis Zadnichek II

Fairhope, AL






Posted by: Charlie <>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>