Re: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

["Charlie cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>]

Or O-5-HE (Hydro-Electric)

Charlie Vlk

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 17, 2017, at 12:53 AM, Rupert Gamlen gamlenz@hotmail.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Louis

Go one stage further and bring it right up to date, powering it with really clean steam, with a Class O-5-WT (wind turbine) or Class O-5-SC (solar cell).

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 

From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:08 a.m.
To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

 

November 14, 2017

 

Group - Remembering the coal burning Class O-5-A and oil burning Class O-5-B 4-8-4's, had the Q remained independent of the BN and stayed with steam power, then, perhaps, in this day and age we would've seen a Class O-5-LNG.......

 

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/mechanical/locomotives/fec-rolls-out-lng.html

 

Even though an LNG burning 4-8-4 would've sounded the same, I think I'd miss the smoke and cinders or soot. Just wouldn't be quite the same with burning liquefied natural gas.....  But, "Clean Steam" does have a nice ring to it, don't you agree - Louis

 

Louis Zadnichek II

Fairhope, AL

 

 

 

 

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Charlie <cvlk@comcast.net>

---

Visit Your Group

• New Members 1

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___