BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG
From: "Charlie cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:16:22 -0600
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=comcast.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=comcast.net; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1510938990; bh=hXWgnGgd0ngauM0obny8PYkTKEhuEI5dxWWSnwWCBps=; h=References:In-Reply-To:To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=QGEWzH65lBYwGb8QCT/cxYw1ZibrJDyv0Vbme/nZRCZTMgNDRiAsMZAqO9iQSp6vZ9I8q82Wxckac4WBGZalXHexehT2jc5TOMi21/RUFjUkbNLew8AaGb7VZN/9OTSG0BzMRaN4vz7qz5VmoO9jgaEF/PebL7riML7uqh+b73M=
In-reply-to: <KL1PR0401MB2053B1079281DFA02742BD93B92F0@KL1PR0401MB2053.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <15fbc2552d7-bf3-a824@webjas-vad220.srv.aolmail.net> <KL1PR0401MB2053B1079281DFA02742BD93B92F0@KL1PR0401MB2053.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Or O-5-HE (Hydro-Electric)
Charlie Vlk

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 17, 2017, at 12:53 AM, Rupert Gamlen gamlenz@hotmail.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Louis

Go one stage further and bring it right up to date, powering it with really clean steam, with a Class O-5-WT (wind turbine) or Class O-5-SC (solar cell).

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 

From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:08 a.m.
To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

 




November 14, 2017

 

Group - Remembering the coal burning Class O-5-A and oil burning Class O-5-B 4-8-4's, had the Q remained independent of the BN and stayed with steam power, then, perhaps, in this day and age we would've seen a Class O-5-LNG.......

 

 

Even though an LNG burning 4-8-4 would've sounded the same, I think I'd miss the smoke and cinders or soot. Just wouldn't be quite the same with burning liquefied natural gas.....  But, "Clean Steam" does have a nice ring to it, don't you agree - Louis

 

Louis Zadnichek II

Fairhope, AL

 

 

 

 






__._,_.___

Posted by: Charlie <cvlk@comcast.net>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>