[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG

To: "" <>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG
From: "Rupert Gamlen [CBQ]" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:53:27 +0000
Accept-language: en-NZ, en-US
Authentication-results:; domainkeys=neutral (no sig);; dkim=pass (ok)
Authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: mailing list
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=echoe; t=1510901617; bh=xj3jCKxAidbQTtBuKJemGA8u0pelYymCxpz891ELifo=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Kam5jIxBZ+5ypo74a3oSKMAeOI/iqppf56lxRrlfRWMaWh5JmOTNzboiFhK2VYmdLV16pWx5aXHEpKEbo7ghIlpj8QfN4d2uamHfw8n9uwTie41diIrdZ17J8+7HhSarm6lUim+yfQ/1yoiCU/0MimfcWxCuLi5uvAkMPJT2szg=
In-reply-to: <>
List-id: <>
List-unsubscribe: <>
Mailing-list: list; contact
References: <>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHTXYRMO2rxh/gfG0OhZtuDM3UksKMYJXIQ
Thread-topic: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG


Go one stage further and bring it right up to date, powering it with really clean steam, with a Class O-5-WT (wind turbine) or Class O-5-SC (solar cell).

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ


From: []
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:08 a.m.
Subject: [CBQ] Class O-5-LNG


November 14, 2017


Group - Remembering the coal burning Class O-5-A and oil burning Class O-5-B 4-8-4's, had the Q remained independent of the BN and stayed with steam power, then, perhaps, in this day and age we would've seen a Class O-5-LNG.......



Even though an LNG burning 4-8-4 would've sounded the same, I think I'd miss the smoke and cinders or soot. Just wouldn't be quite the same with burning liquefied natural gas.....  But, "Clean Steam" does have a nice ring to it, don't you agree - Louis


Louis Zadnichek II

Fairhope, AL






Posted by: Rupert Gamlen <>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>