BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: 1952 flooding

To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: 1952 flooding
From: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:59:27 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: mta1003.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=msn.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=msn.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Authentication-results: yahoogroups.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;yahoogroups.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=msn.com;
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1485871171; bh=JIh7jCgB2fNCAEsEqXXeAmRPj5ilTRTu9IjoUrsvDvc=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=bVjs4X49I9/31T1A51hNargd8feWDb/cWqco6D9PVLyTnKGLU9XGy48+KpobwVxcZz3nn+4SUswBty+tvFVEyGnk9IY4OKL0v+qJRdNYRE8t9cTFaajamgEHbGHYOs59YqfX4jkJqkuW0iS5q9+gdLt0OXxBQU6iVB+GYG4DRTw=
In-reply-to: <1086379010.281020.1485839438979@mail.yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <4AE538E6-18CC-4F36-A71B-AD215E915DF9@kc.rr.com>,<1086379010.281020.1485839438979@mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHSe2EoGDKvfWgczky1JcEIPutf16FSCfYAgACQvMU=
Thread-topic: [CBQ] Re: 1952 flooding


Mark:


Good to hear from you.  And you are right about Denver and Pueblo being dry in 1951, when eastern and particularly southeastern Colorado were in the early stages of a drought that by 1955 had reached record proportions.  The Santa Fe did indeed detour up to Denver over the Joint Line (which, of course, was their own railroad northbound) and east on the Q.  And the railfan photographers seemed to concentrate exclusively on recording the action on the Joint Line rather than on the much less scenic Burlington mainline east from Denver.  Too bad for us Q fans.


For those unaware, though residing down in South Australia, Mark is a learned student of Colorado railroad history, most especially as it pertains to the D&RG/D&RGW, but with a vast storehouse of information on most Colorado lines.  He is not unlike "our own" Rupert Gamlen in New Zealand who has become a treasure trove of Burlington information primarily through online research.


Hol




From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Mark Sellars sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:10 PM
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: 1952 flooding
 
 

Greetings everyone,

Hol Wagner is better able to confirm this that I, but I think Denver to Pueblo CO was largely 'dryish' in July 1951.

My belief is that the ATSF transcon passenger trains, during the re-routing, ran from LA/ SF east to La Junta then Pueblo and Denver CO, before on to the Q.
Some I guess went to Galesburg and some to Kansas City.
The westward trains ran in reverse.

There are many photographs and movies of ATSF transcon trains, including freight extras, on the ATSF/C&S Denver Division.

I would welcome anyone who can set me straight.  :-)

Mark Sellars



From: "Walter Ohrnell wohrnell@kc.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2017, 11:47
Subject: [CBQ] Re: 1952 flooding

 
While working in the Chicago HQ we had copies of the local newspaper showing the devastation from the flood in Kansas City. I believe Denver may have
experienced the same that year.

Walter Ohrnell




__._,_.___

Posted by: Hol Wagner <holpennywagner@msn.com>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>