BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] FW: Antique 1 6 Plate Tintype Photo CB Q Railroad RR Train Eng

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] FW: Antique 1 6 Plate Tintype Photo CB Q Railroad RR Train Engine Locomotive
From: "Charlie Vlk cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:59:30 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=comcast.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=comcast.net; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1473660053; bh=GJsZ9TtlrJ9PAZwaMQAwDAlSy2upUYdMU7GZohbXy4U=; h=References:In-Reply-To:To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=shjeftwokm5ntokohWIPJl6RnaShHR4hoyZ4+Y7CQ8U7aDAzuruE0MO5m3CLFdJcBsqhOOmIBy2LA1how08PwpFId9k1zTm9al+MpgzCq7GPyd6vDf0GHoVKqOzbG18rivb78uhgC5CdmgMjZ8lUfHZGJEO9wS22VW5KHn9hEmk=
In-reply-to: <nr4v9r+15sr7j7@YahooGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <41A61B4E-DB78-42ED-B485-F5D3D6487278@mchsi.com> <056001d20c85$43a9f080$cafdd180$@comcast.net> <nr4v9r+15sr7j7@YahooGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Randy
I don't think the 275 is an absolute established fact....I agree it looks like the enhanced photo has 275 there but it could be scratches in the tintype or reflections on a shiny surface.  At first before you filtered the photo I thought I saw a number on the cab panel but now it looks like the road initials.
Schenectady sure as heck wasn't building engines for a class 1 railroad in 1870 with inclined cylinders, spindly spoked lead truck wheels, curved cabinetry front cab walls, and 3' diameter boilers.
These are all features of 1850s pre Civil War engines.
Maybe there was a renumbering before 1870 if the photo is telling the truth.
I guess this picture at least is worth a thousand words...
Charlie Vlk

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 11, 2016, at 8:10 PM, milepost206@mchsi.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Charlie,

How do you explain the numerals 275 on the dome?

Randy



---In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, <cvlk@...> wrote :

Randy-

No way that machine is Rupert’s #275….. this engine was built prior to 1860 based on the diameter of the boiler and the dual steam domes.

The front truck and inclined cylinders also preclude it from being later.

The 307 attached is more like an 1870s loco.

Follow the angle of the Main Rod down to a reasonable point where it can meet the offset from the center of the driver (eccentric).   The side connecting rod is below the top of the woodpile and if the engine were a 4-2-0 the driver could not be connected to the main rod and not have the engine flip over backward because of balance.

A roster I have for early locomotives states that the Pioneer and Pidgeon were the only 4-2-0s and they had identical specifications…  This list shows them as having inclined cylinders, which we know, and a candidate shows up as having MUCH inclined cylinders….the Corning which was previously raised.   It also has the smallest cylinders of any on the list beyond the Pioneer and Pidgeon…14 1/2x222 went others were 16 or larger.

The Erastus Corning became No.8 and was built in 1852 by Schenectady.

Charlie Vlk



__._,_.___

Posted by: Charlie Vlk <cvlk@comcast.net>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>