To: | "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Train handling question |
From: | "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2014 14:30:32 +0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1400769058; bh=0OX8xVcxRBp9Wf/Fbi224PiLVQYfcC4hswMwrLLHVzE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Original-From:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GINlDC3hUQVyvH91o9QG/UAEt7SaaIsS3gyOhSYOGGmJ3jEfLt8qOYzWjS14KzzhSAnEK/187aDQVqFvG+F3eiewjjhWN/44fg5ZMWWs0JrhPDQXqh5c9AzgFKe3X3DnY2EY1+CQXMBRjVOKQgjusv1gsKFyKKndjmixX6FjxJg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=XKyu00yUbr+AGQ9psstNGO3aUVPbHpdqYAX9DoThei3QG8k0nvYQJ6X+MA4l1WNDCEmg50/slPQItjJIw4Bda4TRJAhc2uS5ho//K7oyOYAvzij6lrXbbY6/jDvQA/lkKBxcyXUqS3gDM3QUq/DA9EKvvVgbyQkcGhgG7KDhZ7o=; |
Importance: | Normal |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
To Leo and others more tuned-in and with more current experience: I haven't run into old co-workers recently to ask this, but in the vein of things not being as much fun on the RR these days, has there been a big change in train handling practices? I have noticed most trains slowing in a bunched condition. Is the stretch frowned on? (Brake shoe wear, etc.) Is being a "wizard with an air brake" (as I heard Fast Eddie E and Barney Joe, among others, referred to) a lost art? I saw reliance on the dynamic coming in the 80's. However, playing with the first generation simulator (a control stand with a computer data screen) it was easy to run the "dangerous" forces off the scale with heavy dynamic. So, to my thinking, knowing how to slow and then re-accelerate using stretched slack was both easier on the loads (and waycar occupants :) and more efficient to operations. Of course, to run stretched required a higher skill level. Is reliance on dynamic a dumbing-down of the craft? Or a broad-brush safety issue? A mis-gauged air set for a signal either resulted in an embarassing too-early or a tense almost-too-late. But it was fun.... Doug Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ------------------------------------ Posted by: dhartman@mchsi.com ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Chat or Chatt or Chatts, Nelson Moyer ku0a@mchsi.com [CBQ] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Train handling question, Leo qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] 9th Annual "24 Hours @ Saginaw" 2014 Schedule of Events, Skip Waters wgcrush@swbell.net [CBQ] |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Train handling question, Leo qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |