BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Train handling question

To: "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [CBQ] Train handling question
From: "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:30:32 +0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1400769058; bh=0OX8xVcxRBp9Wf/Fbi224PiLVQYfcC4hswMwrLLHVzE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Original-From:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GINlDC3hUQVyvH91o9QG/UAEt7SaaIsS3gyOhSYOGGmJ3jEfLt8qOYzWjS14KzzhSAnEK/187aDQVqFvG+F3eiewjjhWN/44fg5ZMWWs0JrhPDQXqh5c9AzgFKe3X3DnY2EY1+CQXMBRjVOKQgjusv1gsKFyKKndjmixX6FjxJg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=XKyu00yUbr+AGQ9psstNGO3aUVPbHpdqYAX9DoThei3QG8k0nvYQJ6X+MA4l1WNDCEmg50/slPQItjJIw4Bda4TRJAhc2uS5ho//K7oyOYAvzij6lrXbbY6/jDvQA/lkKBxcyXUqS3gDM3QUq/DA9EKvvVgbyQkcGhgG7KDhZ7o=;
Importance: Normal
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sensitivity: Normal
To Leo and others more tuned-in and with more current experience:

I haven't run into old co-workers recently to ask this, but in the vein of 
things not being as much fun on the RR these days, has there been a big change 
in train handling practices?

I have noticed most trains slowing in a bunched condition. Is the stretch 
frowned on? (Brake shoe wear, etc.) Is being a "wizard with an air brake" (as I 
heard Fast Eddie E and Barney Joe, among others, referred to) a lost art?

I saw reliance on the dynamic coming in the 80's. However, playing with the 
first generation simulator (a control stand with a computer data screen) it was 
easy to run the "dangerous" forces off the scale with heavy dynamic. 

So, to my thinking, knowing how to slow and then re-accelerate using stretched 
slack was both easier on the loads (and waycar occupants :) and more efficient 
to operations. 

Of course, to run stretched required a higher skill level. Is reliance on 
dynamic a dumbing-down of the craft? Or a broad-brush safety issue? A 
mis-gauged air set for a signal either resulted in an embarassing too-early or 
a tense almost-too-late.

But it was fun....

Doug
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

------------------------------------
Posted by: dhartman@mchsi.com
------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>