BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull & E Unit Performance

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull & E Unit Performance
From: "Brian" <BM4110@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:15:01 -0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echo; t=1352906108; bh=EzijyYKGpjC539Z+IZiGBHfv7IQq2PnsZRAoqeoRACE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=P7cQfwlhkeOLFJ4xtVubESRE4B3kG3BS1jx5LAyZI1ENdyvaQymkI79Rha+nnj4ZgTzrRj14BlP4OYuDGvOxbYllK9R81q2PDACG8SgCkyAf9HQQSoaMNTu+Pk3P2Bh2Lff/G3uerE4PWCp4WfKtTMUJowX8OyHZn9c3LzeoxjI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echo; d=yahoogroups.com; b=IFi/3/JE0vwc7OuKHkGfes6TuxRK9FiibdmXL78aqG+8EP7ohhhsbG+ATS8W3+IGbEJwKEv9NQS7hd/OuX4o1IX0DHgHqRu5MP8VXiRcx1q4SWLt3ge4EqvMcJ3aToovt3lYOi0sjHhRzFabIucTNZ8wgXYAYmVgxmFhnUA7itA=;
In-reply-to: <COL112-W63D30D548F7920C6B85492BB6C0@phx.gbl>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I worked the dinkies in rain service in the late '90s, but never in engine 
service. I had gotten cut off by closing the Cicero hump, and scabbing out the 
Fox River. I went into engine service in Galesburg.

When I was working the Galseburg-Chicago pool, we stayed downtown, just outside 
the Loop. I walked over to CUS a few times, and rode a rounder out to Aurora 
with my old crew.

The engineers said that the cars had been converted to composition shoes about 
the time the F40s came. One time while riding the head end the engineer was 
showing me his present mark for certain stations. A little ways down, he said 
that such-and-such had been where his old mark with cast shoes was.

i believe that the E units and coaches had electro-pneumatic brakes. The stand 
in the engines looks similar to a 24RL. I don't know how the cab cars were 
configured.

The F40s have blended brake. The dynamic brakes come on automatically when the 
air is set. They did not have a dynamic brake handle on the control stands, so 
the dynamic brakes only work with the blended brake. The Winnebago units have 
desk control stands with 30CDW brakes, while the older ones have 26L.

The cab cars were also converted to 30 brake schedule. The controllers were 
older EMD.

The 

--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@...> wrote:
>
> 
> The following comments are strictly from a 'non-expert', observational point 
> of view, because my railroading background is Engineering.  I never operated 
> a locomotive and I rode E-9's only when they were green and were rebuilt.  I 
> did observe the E's of old on numerous Zephyrs in and out of Lincoln, from my 
> dormitory room on 14th Street, in the years 1966 to 1969.  Some of the 
> comments are a little nostalgic, but I think still accurate. In the CB&Q 
> days, it seemed to me that the E Units were louder but mellower, if that is 
> possible.  Perhaps the loudness was because most of the trains I observed had 
> multiple units, with 3 or 4 units on many occasions.  I particularly remember 
> one occasion where I observed the westbound Empire Builder - North Coast 
> Limited south of Maiden Rock.  I could pick up the sound between 30 seconds 
> to a minute prior to the train appearing, in spite of the curves. From a 
> braking standpoint, it seemed to me that the old E's could brake hard and 
> fast, regardless of disc or clasp brakes.  The re-builds seemed to brake 
> slower after they went away from cast iron shoes.  At Lincoln in the late 
> 60's, there was still a lot of westbound Zephyr traffic at night, with #11, 
> #43, and #17, and even #1 if I was up that late.  When the window was open on 
> warm nights, and if the wind was coming from the east, you could hear the 
> whistle from as far away as Havelock.  When the whistle was sounded at Adams 
> St., 27th and 17th, it was clear that the train speed was still high.  At 
> 14th Street, the speed was usually still between 30 and 40, motors at idle 
> but still very audible, and braking heavy to get speed down to 10 mph at 10th 
> Street.    Regarding the rebuilds, I paid more attention to their performance 
> during the twilight of their careers, because by that time, some of my 
> Engineering responsibilities involved track design for commuter rail, and 
> included things like optimum turnout/crossover location and size in 
> relationship to station stops, etc.  Concerning acceleration, I can only 
> compare the E-9's to the Metra units, not the E's of old.  With a short train 
> (6 cars or less), they were quicker off the line, and appeared to out-perform 
> the F-40's for some distance at least, but would fairly quickly lose against 
> the MP-36's.  I think their initial quickness was due to their transition 
> capability, which occurred at 24 mph if memory serves me correctly.  The 
> E-9's appeared to reach transition very quickly (with a short train), usually 
> within 500 feet from start.  Time to transition increased somewhat with a 
> loaded 6 car train vs. one that was empty, and the time increased 
> dramatically with 9 or 10 cars.  This may have been from the lack of shear 
> horsepower for a single unit.  The rebuilds must have had a governor, also.  
> It seemed on express runs that you could continue to run them wide open and 
> they would never seem to get beyond 70 mph. I know nothing technical about 
> the brakes, but prior to the discontinuance of the cast iron shoes, I thought 
> the braking ability of the rebuilds was phenomenal.  Braking was so good that 
> you could run up on a control point at track speed, and reduce to turnout 
> speed within the distance of the interlocking, provided that the interlocking 
> was long enough and the crossover you were going to use was at far end of the 
> interlocking.  The best example of this that I remember was crossing over 
> Main 2 to Main 1 at Fairview Avenue for a stop at Downers Grove Main Street.  
> Also in the cast iron shoe era, you could cross over and then moderately 
> increase speed and still get stopped at places like LaGrange, Hinsdale, and 
> Downers Grove.  After cast iron shoes were discontinued, I didn't see as much 
> of this, although it may have been the particular trains I observed, or fuel 
> savings or something else I don't know about. Regarding braking on the old 
> E's, I do remember one Zephyr trip that includes a story that may be related 
> to braking ability.   On a Spring weekend in 1967, I went to Denver, and rode 
> the California Zephyr back to Lincoln.  We left Denver about 4 hours late, 
> and I was riding in the head vista dome when we approached Fort Morgan.  As 
> we prepared to stop, we were still doing something like 40 mph when we were 
> 500 feet west of the station.  Evidently no one was getting on or off, 
> because the station agent/operator (or someone) gave the engineer the hi-ball 
> with a light, and off we went without stopping.  Whether the engineer knew 
> that he did not need to stop, I don't know.  However, if he was intending to 
> stop, he evidently knew he had good brakes, as quick as he was running up on 
> the station. These are some of my memories, hopefully accurate. Glen Haug
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>