Re: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Iowa bridge dedication

[William Jackson <macon249@yahoo.com>]

John, that might be a reason also. Painting Bridges, would be a easy cut in the budget for me. I would say the cost for all the bridges for BNSF would be, well you get the point.

Bill Jackson

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 19, 2012, at 9:38 PM, "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

I was told the problem was that the bridges would need to be sandblasted to clean them before painting. To do that would cause lead from the lead based paints to be released into the atmosphere.

From: Charlie Vlk <cvlk@comcast.net>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:03 PM

 

 Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Iowa bridge dedication

 

I would be surprised to find ANY engineering / materials protection support for the notion (correct or not as a  BN or BNSF decision ) that not painting ordingary steel as protective measure against rust is a good policy.   COR-TEN steel is designed with weathering to develop a protective coating which inhibits oxidation (rust) damage.  It is not designed to be painted.  It is more costly than regular steels and the additional cost is only recovered through the lack of need to paint it.

Charlie Vlk

 

BN quit painting bridges, quite some time ago. The report was it served no purpose in the longevity of the bridge. In some cases it was said to hold moisture which hurt the bridge. I agree with you I would prefer to see paint. Who knows if that is true, most likely it was a money deal.

Bill Jackson 

 

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___