BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: [CBQ] 2 man crews

To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Fwd: [CBQ] 2 man crews
From: qutlx1@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1344214642; bh=TBO/PUgeFVsLKdWw1cazR4KSovTA5sbswovcuzybn9o=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:X-Mailer:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:Content-Type; b=sq1yXNzTWlo7VyhXP1xLFmPbK18xMGVQeDz9J7mfj9hyuPThL1DBSyVtfXzE+62PrAuNyOuthW7+XFAPtc9J/twXeuopUEecTIuUM+omli0+EnR4ilgszHN4q1STIuYd
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=a/fa2jGFjTff+FnZ0SQP3jk4JeM+yAl2pGpNJ530kw77yFhPDcAiepGeBE5aWP5e4OGCwRgb4oTIFm7ACM3RvghsfqeBQBeM0xlGsada0cs+KDYUikRBBthX5PigF/6Q;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Doug,
 
My understandingmemory from past reading of the files is that the companys logic was we took off a 2 man motor car so a 2 frt man frt job on a lightly travelled branch w/o any other movements and no mainline movements beyond town should not be a problem for 2 men.
 
Now here's a question for you and some of the others Q/BN vets that has come to mind. Was the day Aurora switch job a two man crew ? I seem to remember that but it's getting a bit hazy. If so I'm sure the discussion was about how little the job had to do in the shops and local industry. 
 
Leo


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
--- Begin Message ---
To: "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] 2 man crews
From: dhartman@mchsi.com
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:39:04 +0000
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1344206294; bh=YgWv11oYr6NuEOtXENU37To95qeiVMpaSw6ge3yiCSo=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=F2pdaTQDC7p9zo4D4pjKjPvsav6PnKIjGoxsqOt5SZtbxRlZtHaFozcdBS5+wYUofZHcdF05T0iCfXkSn+GAaX6w+xhkDPZFvQZARa+hziWX3FCum4BsXGpkO8iLndPY
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=qMolpQLg23VffB+cQ6Zb2yk6kv72DjnPfDX0BnYJFP2lAu0OeHzU3tnvgje3SwUYJb0H9RbdzcqGMUzxoit/0bXuazrzR9ozTxvXXWYM18mhrJi7AsZ/UhpdjvXFv/M8;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <845477CF-DA04-4B41-9090-C53867F77C21@aol.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <dba2.2eb2c324.3d4fdbb3@aol.com> <441476474-1344188002-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1576810105-@b12.c18.bise6.blackberry> <845477CF-DA04-4B41-9090-C53867F77C21@aol.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sensitivity: Normal
 

Ahh. Between stations was the key. So the Oregon RS was an old local agreement. Didn't have anything to do with motor car going down main (or did it, on Mt M branch?)?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: qutlx1@aol.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:43:23 -0500
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com<CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] 2 man crews

 

Doug youre right,but the mainline comment refers to between Requiring flagging if stopped

Leo

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2012, at 12:34 PM, dhartman@mchsi.com wrote:

 

And, Leo, a restriction on "main line work" couldn't have applied because most of the Oregon Rd Swt work was done on the main. And when I worked it there were very few trips to Mt Morris. It was nearly all sand plant. Doug

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Fwd: [CBQ] 2 man crews

 

Pete,
 
That bumping and that staying on the cement job were certainly an interesting case of a local agreement.
 
It was also local agreements that made the Oregon-Mt Morris job a two man and the other Aurora Division job was the later version of the "Moonlight Job" that ran between Mendota and Denrock.
 
Without digging in the files and trusting my memory.......... both of these jobs were preceeded by motor car passenger runs that were of course a two man train crew. When the motor cars came off the jobs were locally negotiated to be two man frt crews. Also in the case of the Moonlight Job this stretch of track had at one time been served by 2 passenger trains,69/64 from Cicero to Barstow and a frt local. I believe the point in each jobs discussion was there was only light work and no mainline running.
 
The interesting thing about the Oregon-Mt Morris job was that in the mid to late 70s as the sand plant grew the volume of cars handled really grew but the job remained 2 man.
 
Leo
 
Leo


--- End Message ---
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>