BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Carrollton branch line (again)

To: <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Carrollton branch line (again)
From: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:42:33 -0700
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1336426955; bh=JZzQ33KWvMKyvYX2JhqFIgMG3eigp4FhEky5WJzmHG8=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:Importance:In-Reply-To:References:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=dGfWKC4s9uTvypv4JIJr37RjsupCCrCmOuf+ilg4fNaDjCGyzoGfYIwqxKi2XsOfor7Ekc4nMoVsynVOpKLKNQTdK5pXcPi994Hiltb46sU7c/isdfpd2pQg84p88vVR
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=AUYIbHizlWPegSzSrqIE6ddz/BuWJoxbHL4srjdDuy28qsMIr0OhVcIyNrDqQpTJaRGzD6VHJwiSnlRralOpJfD+lq7TfRyWgmSXxkR1dUu2cMBVSWwdc1ev2xKU0tA6;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <C264B20F452D45D8BAAA6AA6F5A40CAB@jacobs.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <jo8nol+uvkj@eGroups.com>,<C264B20F452D45D8BAAA6AA6F5A40CAB@jacobs.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


The original maps show a connection to the AT&SF but I don't know if it was an official interchange.  The Carrollton depot was at MP 220.66, but the end of the Q main track and division of ownership was at MP 220.94.  The AT&SF owned 419' more of a connecting track to an AT&SF siding.  Also the turntable was mentioned in a previous post.  There was a 60' turntable on a stub track on the west side of the house track, northwest of the depot, opposite mainline MP 220.53.  The connection to AT&SF must have been removed sometime prior to the mid 60's because there is no track shown beyond MP 220.94 in the alignment chart dated 4-8-65.
 
Glen Haug 

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
From: wabashrr@swbell.net
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:41:28 -0500
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Carrollton branch line (again)

 
On Behalf Of smokyjoe66
 
I have no knowledge whether there was ever an interchange between the Q and the Wabash or AT & SF at Carrollton. 
 
 
Smokyjoe,
 
There was no interchange with the Wabash at Carrollton.  It would have been physically possible to have one with the ATSF; but I do not know if a connection existed.
 
gary roe
quincy, illinois 




__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>