To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: operational question |
From: | "Douglas Harding" <doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org> |
Date: | Tue, 4 Oct 2011 07:31:12 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1317731477; bh=p+nAoElxdP6vNYX+7QqjnNSFfc2culNnVTM0plImLM4=; h=Received:Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Khm/fzkh/zTZmQZFIAQ4gT7U4/325ebI86Os/HPl9J6j0Ei3v725vLoyJBaJEjjjkIO7OpiODzGyM21QodEXnF6tZsSioipBem2v1uiYSKQAaLDKj0ATFuS3uwwNvcPa |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ZmKVl3CMwZcqbEDrrHK1eCQbA5kQbmtXGHHgmC8KNRsJrf3M9wFGen4R/saq79Yx8IKFs9ha82g8ooCJDzhJvrx1/dKa0lgoVdJcfH2iz3E1zv89CLVv+0EW9uLhFeWd; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Thread-index: | AcyCj0xXz080TXIdRrGg06B0ctXdqw== |
Duncan, era will have an impact on your question. If you are asking about pre 1980, ie pre Staggers Act, there were tariffs that dictated rates charged/paid, these were fixed regardless of which road hauled the load, so no savings if the shipper selected one railroad over another. And the shipper dictated routing, ie which railroad hauled the load. Some shippers listen to their railroad agent, ie the one who switched the business, who always promoted his road for the long haul. Sometimes the destination dictated who got the long haul. And sometimes the shipper had a preference. A reciprocal agreement might have nothing to do with which railroad hauled the load out of town A Railroad Shippers Guide or industry list will tell you if there was reciprocal switching. Bill Hirt probably has one, if no one else does. If no reciprocal switching and on a Q line, the Q would get the line haul for switching the plant and starting the load moving, even if only a mile to another yard. Of course this all changed with the Staggers Act of 1980. How things are done today is quite different. Doug Harding www.iowacentralrr.org [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] operational question, Duncan Cameron |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] operational question, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Material Service Company on East End, qutlx1 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Re: operational question, Duncan Cameron |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |